doi: 10.56294/dm2023115
ORIGINAL
Chatbots for medical students exploring medical students’ attitudes and concerns towards artificial intelligence and medical chatbots
Chatbots para estudiantes de medicina: exploración de las actitudes y preocupaciones de los estudiantes de medicina hacia la inteligencia artificial y los chatbots médicos
Berrami Hind1 , Zineb Serhier1,2
, Manar Jallal1
, Mohammed Bennani Othmani1,2
1Medical Informatic department, Hospital August 20, Casablanca. Morocco.
2Neuroscience and Mental Health Laboratory, Hassan II University, Casablanca, Morocco.
Cite as: Hind B, Serhier Z, Jallal M, Bennani Othmani M. Chatbots for medical students exploring medical students’ attitudes and concerns towards artificial intelligence and medical chatbots. Data and Metadata. 2023;2:115. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2023115
Submitted: 01-09-2023 Revised: 24-10-2023 Accepted: 28-12-2023 Published: 29-12-2023
Editor: Prof.
Dr. Javier González Argote
Note: Paper presented at the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Smart Environments (ICAISE’2023).
ABSTRACT
Introduction: artificial intelligence (AI) encompasses the concept of automated machines that can perform tasks typically carried out by humans, doctor-patient communication will increasingly rely on the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare, especially in medicine and digital assistant systems like chatbots. The objective of this study is to explore the understanding, utilization, and apprehensions of future doctors at the Faculty of Medicine in Casablanca regarding the adoption of artificial intelligence, particularly intelligent chatbots.
Methods: a cross-sectional study was conducted among students from the 1st to 5th year at the Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy in Casablanca. Probability sampling was implemented using a clustered and stratified approach based on the year of study. Electronic forms were distributed to randomly selected groups of students.
Results: among the participants, 52 % of students fully agreed to utilize chatbots capable of answering health-related queries, while 39 % partially agreed to use chatbots for providing diagnoses regarding health conditions. About concerns, 77 % of the respondents expressed fear regarding reduced transparency regarding the utilization of personal data, and 66 % expressed concerns about diminished professional autonomy.
Conclusion: Moroccan Medical students are open to embracing AI in the field of medicine. The study highlights their ability to grasp the fundamental aspects of how AI and chatbots will impact their daily work, while the overall attitude towards the use of clinical AI was positive, participants also expressed certain concerns.
Keywords: Medical Students; Chatbots; Artificial Intelligence; Concerns.
RESUMEN
Introducción: la inteligencia artificial (IA) abarca el concepto de máquinas automatizadas que pueden realizar tareas típicamente llevadas a cabo por humanos, la comunicación médico-paciente dependerá cada vez más de la integración de la inteligencia artificial (IA) en la asistencia sanitaria, especialmente en medicina y sistemas de asistentes digitales como los chatbots. El objetivo de este estudio es explorar la comprensión, la utilización y las aprensiones de los futuros médicos de la Facultad de Medicina de Casablanca con respecto a la adopción de la inteligencia artificial, en particular los chatbots inteligentes.
Métodos: se realizó un estudio transversal entre estudiantes de 1º a 5º curso de la Facultad de Medicina y Farmacia de Casablanca. Se aplicó un muestreo probabilístico mediante un enfoque agrupado y estratificado basado en el año de estudio. Se distribuyeron formularios electrónicos a grupos de estudiantes seleccionados
al azar.
Resultados: entre los participantes, el 52 % de los estudiantes estaba totalmente de acuerdo en utilizar
chatbots capaces de responder a consultas relacionadas con la salud, mientras que el 39 % estaba parcialmente de acuerdo en utilizar chatbots para proporcionar diagnósticos relativos a condiciones de salud. En cuanto a las preocupaciones, el 77 % de los encuestados expresaron su temor por la reducción de la transparencia en la utilización de datos personales, y el 66 % expresaron su preocupación por la disminución de la autonomía profesional.
Conclusiones: los estudiantes de medicina marroquíes están abiertos a adoptar la IA en el campo de la medicina. El estudio destaca su capacidad para comprender los aspectos fundamentales de cómo la IA y los chatbots afectarán a su trabajo diario, aunque la actitud general hacia el uso de la IA clínica fue positiva, los participantes también expresaron ciertas preocupaciones.
Palabras clave: Estudiantes de Medicina; Chatbots; Inteligencia Artificial; Preocupaciones.
INTRODUCTION
The healthcare system is currently undergoing a digital revolution, and artificial intelligence (AI) will play a crucial role in shaping the everyday practices of medical professionals.(1) The advent of digital applications, which can be accessed irrespective of location and time, has opened up new possibilities in medicine and health communication, consequently altering the doctor-patient dynamic.(2) The increasing significance of e-health applications, wearable devices, and AI tools like chatbots empowers patients to gather their own health data.(3,4) Additionally, the digital integration of patients, hospitals, physicians, and other healthcare services is driving a shift from a doctor-centered approach to a more patient-centered model of treatment.(5) In order to harness the potential of these technological advancements and ensure optimal care for patients, future medical practitioners must possess the appropriate skills.(6)
Machine learning (ML) is a branch of artificial intelligence (AI) that enhances its capabilities by learning from data and experiences, rather than relying on predefined rules as in traditional approaches.(7) Progress in ML has yielded numerous advantages in terms of accuracy, decision-making, fast processing, cost-effectiveness, and the ability to handle intricate data.(8) Chatbots is an example of AI systems that have evolved through the application of ML techniques.
The objective of this study is to explore the understanding, utilization, and apprehensions of future doctors at the Faculty of Medicine in Casablanca regarding the adoption of artificial intelligence, particularly intelligent chatbots.
METHODS
In April 2023, a cross-sectional study was conducted among students from the 1st to 5th year at the Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy in Casablanca. The sample size was determined using Epi Info software, taking into account a percentage of 52 % of medical students taken from a European article who had knowledge in terms of AI in radiology, with a precision of 5 %. The calculated sample size was 335 students.
Probability sampling was implemented using a clustered and stratified approach based on the year of study. Electronic forms were distributed to randomly selected groups of students.
The data analysis was performed using R software, and the association was assessed using the chi-square test with a significance level of 5 %.
RESULTS
Socio-demographic characteristics
A total of 393 responses were received from participating students, with a mean age of 20,6 ± 1,84 years. Among the respondents, women comprised 67 % of the sample, indicating a significant female predominance.
We note a predominance of 5th year students 22,4 % followed by 4th year medical students 20,1 %.
Attitudes of medical student toward intelligent chatbots in medicine
Among the participants, 52 % of students fully agreed to utilize chatbots capable of answering health-related queries, while 39 % partially agreed to use chatbots for providing diagnoses regarding health conditions. Most respondents, accounting for 67 %, expressed agreement with the use of chatbots for scheduling appointments for patients.
Additionally, 52 % strongly supported the utilization of chatbots to assist them in addressing health concerns and to provide supplementary information about their well-being. (table 1)
Table 1. Attitudes toward intelligent chatbots in medicine |
|||||
|
Completely ready N (%) |
Partially ready N (%) |
Not quite ready N (°%) |
Not at all ready N (%) |
I Don’t know N (%) |
To respond to your health-related questions |
204(52,0) |
140(35,6) |
24(6,0) |
17(4,4) |
5(5,0) |
To give diagnoses on your health condition |
81(20,6) |
152(38,7) |
75(19,1) |
70(17,8) |
15(3,8) |
To you propose care |
86(21,9) |
155(39,4) |
67(17,0) |
71(18,1) |
14(3,6) |
To conduct certain tests or examinations |
126(32,1) |
156(39,7) |
53(13,5) |
35(8,9) |
23(5,8) |
Planning your appointments with patients |
263(66,9) |
99(25,2) |
9(2,3) |
12(3,1) |
10(2,5) |
To Support you in matters of health and provide you with additional information |
205(52,2) |
148(37,7) |
20(5,1) |
10(2,5) |
10(2,5) |
Potential applications of AI in medicine perceived by medical student
Among students, 68 % noted the importance of AI in automating diagnostics, followed by the optimization of continuing education for 17 % of respondents. (figure 1)
Figure 1. Perceived potential applications of AI in medicine
Medical students concerned about the use of AI in clinical practice
When it comes to apprehensions surrounding the integration of artificial intelligence into their clinical practice, 77 % of the respondents expressed fear regarding reduced transparency regarding the utilization of personal data.
Additionally, 66 % expressed concerns about diminished professional autonomy, while an equal percentage of 62 % were worried about being overwhelmed by the increased reliance on artificial intelligence in their daily work. In terms of job security, 56 % of the participants agreed with the notion that they would face negative consequences as a result of the widespread adoption of AI. (table 2)
Table 2. Medical students concerned about the use of AI in medicine |
|||
Questions |
Agree |
Neutral |
Disagree |
I am concerned that there is less transparency about how personal data is used |
298(77,0) |
51(13,2) |
38(9,8) |
I'm afraid of having less autonomy at work |
257(66,6) |
71(18,4) |
58(15,1) |
I fear that my qualifications are no longer sufficient for the requirements of my field of work |
184(61,5) |
80(20,7) |
69(17,8) |
I am afraid of being overloaded by the use of artificial intelligence in my daily work |
241(62,5) |
77(19,9) |
68(17,6) |
I am afraid to lose my job after the widespread use of AI |
216(56,0) |
65(16,8) |
105(27,2) |
DISCUSSION
Artificial intelligence (AI) encompasses the concept of automated machines that can perform tasks typically carried out by humans.(9,10,11,12) The field of AI is rapidly evolving, and numerous applications have already become part of our daily lives, such as speech and text recognition and email spam filters.(13,14,15) However, the potential of AI to revolutionize global health in low- and middle-income countries is also being explored due to its ability to apply advanced analytical methods to large datasets involved in complex diagnostic tasks.(16)
In our study, we found that 52 % of medical student completely agreed to utilize chatbots that can answer health-related questions, while 39 % partially agreed to use chatbots for diagnosing health conditions. In a separate study of medical students, 50 % showed partial willingness to use chatbots for answering health-related questions, while 59 % were not willing to use them for health diagnoses.(17)
Furthermore, the majority of respondents (67 %) agreed with using chatbots to schedule appointments for patients, and 52 % strongly supported their use in providing support for health issues and delivering additional health information.(18) Concerning Potential applications of AI in medicine perceived by medical student, 68 % noted the importance of AI in automating diagnostics, followed by the optimization of continuing education for 17 % of respondents.(19,20,21,22)
Regarding concerns about AI use in clinical practice, 56 % expressed fear of job loss due to its generalization, while 77 % were concerned about the lack of transparency regarding the use of personal data. Additionally, 67 % expressed fears of reduced autonomy and being overloaded by the use of AI in their daily work.(23,24) These findings align with an article that highlighted concerns about computerized chatbots, including decreased human presence, which can lead to increased distrust in healthcare services. Healthcare professionals and patients often lack confidence in chatbot capabilities, which can raise concerns about clinical care risks, liability, and increased workload rather than reduced workload.(23,24,25)
CONCLUSION
According to this research, it is evident that medical students are open to embracing AI in the field of medicine. The study highlights their ability to grasp the fundamental aspects of how AI and chatbots will impact their daily work. While the overall attitude towards the use of clinical AI was positive, participants also expressed certain concerns. These concerns mainly revolved around the lack of transparency regarding the utilization of personal data and the potential loss of autonomy when working with AI in medical practice.
Considering the future advancements in the healthcare workplace, it becomes crucial to underscore the importance of incorporating these new core competencies into medical curricula. This will enable physicians to actively participate in shaping the technological trajectory of patient treatment, equipped with comprehensive knowledge and confidence in utilizing AI tools.
REFERENCES
1. Digitale Medienprodukte in der Arzt-Patienten-Kommunikation. springerprofessional.de n.d. https://www.springerprofessional.de/digitale-medienprodukte-in-der-arzt-patienten-kommunikation/12057004 (accessed June 12, 2023).
2. Kundu S. How will artificial intelligence change medical training? Commun Med 2021;1:8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-021-00003-5.
3. Lin B, Wu S. Digital Transformation in Personalized Medicine with Artificial Intelligence and the Internet of Medical Things. Omics J Integr Biol 2022;26:77–81. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2021.0037.
4. Bates M. Health Care Chatbots Are Here to Help. IEEE Pulse 2019;10:12–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/MPULS.2019.2911816.
5. Rajpurkar P, Chen E, Banerjee O, Topol EJ. AI in health and medicine. Nat Med 2022;28:31–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01614-0.
6. Ng KH, Wong JHD. A clarion call to introduce artificial intelligence (AI) in postgraduate medical physics curriculum. Phys Eng Sci Med 2022;45:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-022-01099-2.
7. Kersting K. Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence: Two Fellow Travelers on the Quest for Intelligent Behavior in Machines. Front Big Data 2018;1:6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2018.00006.
8. Velayutham S. Handbook of Research on Applications and Implementations of Machine Learning Techniques. IGI Global; 2019.
9. Amisha null, Malik P, Pathania M, Rathaur VK. Overview of artificial intelligence in medicine. J Fam Med Prim Care 2019;8:2328–31. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_440_19.
10. Taulli T. Artificial Intelligence Basics: A Non-Technical Introduction. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-5028-0.
11. Schwalbe N, Wahl B. Artificial intelligence and the future of global health. Lancet Lond Engl 2020;395:1579–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30226-9.
12. Moldt J-A, Festl-Wietek T, Madany Mamlouk A, Nieselt K, Fuhl W, Herrmann-Werner A. Chatbots for future docs: exploring medical students’ attitudes and knowledge towards artificial intelligence and medical chatbots. Med Educ Online n.d.;28:2182659. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2023.2182659.
13. Parviainen J, Rantala J. Chatbot breakthrough in the 2020s? An ethical reflection on the trend of automated consultations in health care. Med Health Care Philos 2022;25:61–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-021-10049-w.
14. Castillo-Gonzalez W. Charting the Field of Human Factors and Ergonomics: A Bibliometric Exploration. Health Leadership and Quality of Life 2022;1:6-6. https://doi.org/10.56294/hl20226
15. Farhaoui, Y.and All, Big Data Mining and Analytics, 2023, 6(3), pp. I–II, DOI: 10.26599/BDMA.2022.9020045
16. Auza-Santiváñez JC, Díaz JAC, Cruz OAV, Robles-Nina SM, Escalante CS, Huanca BA. mHealth in health systems: barriers to implementation. Health Leadership and Quality of Life 2022;1:7-7. https://doi.org/10.56294/hl20227.
17. Murillo-Ticona TA, Berneso-Soto ML. Los Entornos Virtuales de Aprendizaje al rescate del servicio educativo. Sincretismo 2020;1
18. Uman JMM, Arias LVC, Romero-Carazas R. Factores que dificultan la graduación: El caso de la carrera profesional de contabilidad en las universidades peruanas. Revista Científica Empresarial Debe-Haber 2023;1:58-74
19.Alaoui, S.S., and all. "Hate Speech Detection Using Text Mining and Machine Learning", International Journal of Decision Support System Technology, 2022, 14(1), 80. DOI: 10.4018/IJDSST.286680
20. Alaoui, S.S., and all. ,"Data openness for efficient e-governance in the age of big data", International Journal of Cloud Computing, 2021, 10(5-6), pp. 522–532, https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCC.2021.120391
21. El Mouatasim, A., and all. "Nesterov Step Reduced Gradient Algorithm for Convex Programming Problems", Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 2020, 81, pp. 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23672-4_11
22. Tarik, A., and all."Recommender System for Orientation Student" Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 2020, 81, pp. 367–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23672-4_27
23. Sossi Alaoui, S., and all. "A comparative study of the four well-known classification algorithms in data mining", Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 2018, 25, pp. 362–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69137-4_32
24. Gonzalez-Argote J. Analyzing the Trends and Impact of Health Policy Research: A Bibliometric Study. Health Leadership and Quality of Life 2023;2:28-28. https://doi.org/10.56294/hl202328
25. Gonzalez-Argote J. Patterns in Leadership and Management Research: A Bibliometric Review. Health Leadership and Quality of Life 2022;1:10-10. https://doi.org/10.56294/hl202210
FINANCING
The authors did not receive financing for the development of this research.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
AUTHORSHIP CONTRIBUTION
Conceptualization: Berrami Hind, Zineb Serhier, Manar Jallal, Mohammed Bennani Othmani.
Research: Berrami Hind, Zineb Serhier, Manar Jallal, Mohammed Bennani Othmani.
Drafting - original draft: Berrami Hind, Zineb Serhier, Manar Jallal, Mohammed Bennani Othmani.
Writing - proofreading and editing: Berrami Hind, Zineb Serhier, Manar Jallal, Mohammed Bennani Othmani.