Decision making in university contexts based on knowledge management systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/dm202292Keywords:
Knowledge Management, Decision-Making, Higher Education, Evidence-Based DecisionsAbstract
Introduction: knowledge management constitutes a fundamental process for decision-making, hence its importance in complex and competitive contexts.
Objective: analyze the importance of knowledge management in decision making for the improvement of higher education institutions.
Methods: a literature review oriented to thematic analysis of the field of study was implemented.
Results: the data analyzed suggest the need for new studies to achieve a better understanding of the relationship between decision making and knowledge management in higher education institutions, as well as showing the importance of achieving integrated systems to achieve better internal linkage. and external.
Conclusions: knowledge management constitutes a key process for informed decision-making and facilitates the improvement of internal processes and positioning in the context and labor markets
References
1. Sanabria Martínez MJ. Construir nuevos espacios sostenibles respetando la diversidad cultural desde el nivel local. Región Científica. 2022; 1(1).
2. Ode E, Ayavoo R. The mediating role of knowledge application in the relationship between knowledge management practices and firm innovation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 2020; 5(3): p. 210-218.
3. Ricardo Jiménez LS. Dimensiones de emprendimiento: Relación educativa. El caso del programa cumbre. Región Científica. 2022; 1(1).
4. Fernández-García CM, Rodríguez-Álvarez M, Viñuela-Hernández MP. University students and their perception of teaching effectiveness. Effects on students’ engagement. Revista de Psicodidáctica. 2021; 26(1): p. 62-69.
5. Peñaloza Jiménez NL, López Cabrera T, Duque Tobar AL. Lineamientos adoptados en el sector educativo del municipio de El Paujil-Caquetá en tiempo de pandemia. Negonotas Docentes. 2022;(19).
6. Pérez Gamboa AJ. La orientación educativa universitaria en Cuba: situación actual en la formación no pedagógica. Revista Conrado. 2022; 18(89): p. 75-86.
7. Ledesma F, Malave González BE. Patrones de comunicación científica sobre E-commerce: un estudio bibliométrico en la base de datos Scopus. Región Científica. 2022; 1(1).
8. Cano C, Castillo V. Mapping the structure of knowledge about Community and Home Care. Community and Interculturality in Dialogue 2022;2.
9. Pérez Gamboa AJ, Echerri Garcés D, García Acevedo Y. Proyecto de vida como categoría de la pedagogía de la Educación Superior: aproximaciones a una teoría fundamentada. Transformación. 2021 septiembre-diciembre; 17(3): p. 411-427.
10. Kolade O, Adegbile A, Sarpong D. Can university-industry-government collaborations drive a 3D printing revolution in Africa? A triple helix model of technological leapfrogging in additive manufacturing. Technology in Society. 2022; 69.
11. Yoda N, Kuwashima K. Triple Helix of University–Industry–Government Relations in Japan: Transitions of Collaborations and Interactions. Journal of the Knowledge Economy. 2020; 11: p. 1120–1144.
12. Hernández-Trasobares A, Murillo-Luna J. The effect of triple helix cooperation on business innovation: The case of Spain. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2020; 161.
13. Cano C, Castillo V. Unveiling the Thematic Landscape of Cultural Studies Through Bibliometric Analysis. Community and Interculturality in Dialogue 2022;2.
14. Wagner CS, Zhang L, Leydesdorff L. A discussion of measuring the top-1% most-highly cited publications: quality and impact of Chinese papers. Scientometrics. 2022; 127: p. 1825–1839.
15. Abbas J, Sağsan M. Impact of knowledge management practices on green innovation and corporate sustainable development: A structural analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019; 229: p. 611-620.
16. Gómez Cano CA. Ingreso, permanencia y estrategias para el fomento de los Semilleros de Investigación en una IES de Colombia. Región Científica. 2022; 1(1): p. 1-12.
17. Oktari RS, Munadi K, Idroes R, Sofyan H. Knowledge management practices in disaster management: Systematic review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 2020; 51.
18. Bibi G, Padhi M, Dash SS. Theoretical necessity for rethinking knowledge in knowledge management literature. Knowledge Management Research & Practice. 2021; 19(3): p. 396-407.
19. Baronian L. The regime of truth of knowledge management: the role of information systems in the production of tacit knowledge. Knowledge Management Research & Practice. 2022; 20(2): p. 191-201.
20. Hossain MB, Nassar S, Rahman MU, Dunay A, Illés CB. Exploring the mediating role of knowledge management practices to corporate sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022; 374: p. 133869.
21. Hernández García de Velazco JJ. Sociedades del conocimiento y ciencia abierta en la nueva normalidad. JURÍDICAS CUC. 2022; 18(1): p. 1-4.
22. Durst S, Zieba M. Knowledge risks inherent in business sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020.
23. The Impact of Sustainable Development and Social Responsibility on Quality Education. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism. 2022; 13(1): p. 51-62.
24. Pérez Gamboa AJ, Raga Aguilar LM, García Acevedo Y. La plataforma MOODLE como espacio para la acción orientadora. Revista Varela. 2022; 22(63): p. 181-190.
25. Borges Machín AY, González Bravo YL. Educación comunitaria para un envejecimiento activo: experiencia en construcción desde el autodesarrollo. Región Científica. 2022; 1(1): p. 202212.
26. Restrepo Pimienta J, Hernández-Fernández L, Cruz Mahecha D. Compromiso del Estado frente a la protección social en salud de las etnias. JURÍDICAS CUC. 2022; 19(1): p. 9-34.
27. Creswell JW, Creswell JD. Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative and mixed approaches. 3rd ed.: Sage; 2017.
28. Harrison R, Reilly T, Creswell J. Methodological Rigor in Mixed Methods: An Application in Management Studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2020; 14(4): p. 1-23.
29. Levitt H, Bamberg , Creswell J, Frost D, Josselson , Suárez-Orozco. Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Primary, Qualitative Meta-Analytic, and Mixed Methods Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report. American Psychologist. 2018; 73(1): p. 26-46.
30. Joo JY, Liu M. Nurses’ barriers to caring for patients with COVID-19: a qualitative systematic review. International Nursing Review. 2021; 68(2): p. 1-12.
31. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International Journal of Surgery. 2021; 88: p. 105906.
32. Linnenluecke MK, Marrone M, Singh AK. Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management. 2020; 45(2): p. 175-194.
33. Sahibzada UF, Jianfeng C, Latif KF, Shafait Z, Sahibzada HF. Interpreting the impact of knowledge management processes on organizational performance in Chinese higher education: mediating role of knowledge worker productivity. Studies in Higher Education. 2022; 47(4): p. 713-730.
34. Machado AdB, Secinaro S, Calandra D, Lanzalonga F. Knowledge management and digital transformation for Industry 4.0: a structured literature review. Knowledge Management Research & Practice. 2022; 20(2): p. 320-338.
35. Al-Husseini S, El Beltagi I, Moizer J. Transformational leadership and innovation: the mediating role of knowledge sharing amongst higher education faculty. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 2021; 24(5): p. 670-693.
36. Ammirato S, Linzalone R, Felicetti AM. Knowledge management in pandemics. A critical literature review. Knowledge Management Research & Practice. 2021; 19(4): p. 415-426.
37. Naeem A, Mirza NH, Ayyub RM, Lodhi RN. HRM practices and faculty’s knowledge sharing behavior: mediation of affective commitment and affect-based trust. Studies in Higher Education. 2019; 44(3): p. 499-512.
38. Saide S, Sheng ML. Knowledge exploration–exploitation and information technology: crisis management of teaching–learning scenario in the COVID-19 outbreak. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 2021; 33(8): p. 927-942.
39. Akter S, Bandara R, Hani U, Wamba SF, Foropon C, Papadopoulos T. Analytics-based decision-making for service systems: A qualitative study and agenda for future research. International Journal of Information Management. 2019 October; 48: p. 85-95.
40. Arpaci I, Al-Emran M, Al-Sharafi MA. The impact of knowledge management practices on the acceptance of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) by engineering students: A cross-cultural comparison. Telematics and Informatics. 2020 November; 54: p. 101468.
41. Al-Kurdi OF, El-Haddadeh R, Eldabi T. The role of organisational climate in managing knowledge sharing among academics in higher education. International Journal of Information Management. 2020 February; 50: p. 217-227.
42. Azeem M, Ahmed M, Haider S, Sajjad M. Expanding competitive advantage through organizational culture, knowledge sharing and organizational innovation. Technology in Society. 2021 August; 66: p. 101635.
43. Martins VWB, Rampasso IS, Anholon R, Quelhas OLG, Leal Filho W. Knowledge management in the context of sustainability: Literature review and opportunities for future research. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019; 229(20): p. 489-500.
44. Di Vaio A, Palladino R, Pezzi A, Kalisz DE. The role of digital innovation in knowledge management systems: A systematic literature review. Journal of Business Research. 2021 February; 123: p. 220-231.
45. Sun Y, Liu J, Ding Y. Analysis of the relationship between open innovation, knowledge management capability and dual innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 2020; 32(1): p. 15-28.
46. de Wit-de Vries E, Dolfsma WA, van der Windt HJ, Gerkema MP. Knowledge transfer in university–industry research partnerships: a review. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2019; 44: p. 1236–1255.
47. Ahmed YA, Ahmad MN, Ahmad N, Zakaria NH. Social media for knowledge-sharing: A systematic literature review. Telematics and Informatics. 2019 April; 37: p. 72-112.
48. Mahdi OR, Nassar IA, Almsafir MK. Knowledge management processes and sustainable competitive advantage: An empirical examination in private universities. Journal of Business Research. 2019 January; 94.
49. Quarchioni S, Paternostro S, Trovarelli F. Knowledge management in higher education: a literature review and further research avenues. Knowledge Management Research & Practice. 2022; 20(2): p. 304-319.
50. Asiedu NK, Abah M, Johnson Dei DG. Understanding knowledge management strategies in institutions of higher learning and the corporate world: A systematic review. Cogent Business & Management. 2022; 9(1).
51. Veer-Ramjeawon P, Rowley J. Embedding knowledge management in higher education institutions (HEIs): a comparison between two countries. Studies in Higher Education. 2020; 45(11): p. 2324-2340.
52. Fullwood R, Rowley J, McLean J. Exploring the factors that influence knowledge sharing between academics. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 2019; 43(8): p. 1051-1063.
53. Lent RW, Brown SD. Career decision making, fast and slow: Toward an integrative model of intervention for sustainable career choice. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2020 August; 120: p. 103448.
54. Mutahar Y, Farea MM, Abdulrab M, Al-Mamary YH, Alfalah AA, Grada M. The contribution of trust to academic knowledge sharing among academics in the Malaysian research institutions. Cogent Business & Management. 2022; 9(1).
55. Aldowah H, Al-Samarraie H, Alzahrani AI, Alalwan N. Factors affecting student dropout in MOOCs: a cause and effect decision‐making model. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 2020; 32: p. 429–454
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Alfredo Javier Pérez Gamboa, Carlos Alberto Gómez Cano, Verenice Sánchez Castillo (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
