From Weaving Patterns to Data Patterns: AI-Driven Cultural Documentation of East Sumba’s Ikat Traditions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/dm20251129Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Intelligent Systems, Culture, Knowledge RepresentationAbstract
Introduction: This study aims to develop and test a metadata-driven, AI-assisted framework for documenting the visual, oral, and symbolic elements of ikat weaving in East Sumba. It seeks to explore how artificial intelligence can transform traditional knowledge into machine-readable cultural data structures while maintaining epistemological integrity and community participation.
Methods: This research employed a hybrid qualitative-technical methodology. Ethnographic fieldwork was conducted with ikat artisans in East Sumba to gather narrative and visual data, including interviews, ritual transcripts, and photographs of woven fabrics. These data were analyzed using a combination of natural language processing (NLP) and computer vision algorithms. NLP was used to extract recurring linguistic patterns and cosmological themes, while computer vision categorized visual motifs by type, symmetry, and symbolic meaning.
Results:The AI-driven approach effectively captured the symbolic and narrative complexity of the ikat tradition. Computer vision techniques successfully identified and classified motif types and regional styles, linking them to spiritual meanings conveyed by the artisans. NLP analysis of transcribed interviews revealed consistent narrative patterns related to ancestral cosmology, customary law, and motif symbolism.
Conclusion: This research demonstrates the viability of combining AI technologies with ethnographic fieldwork to create a robust, ethical, and culturally sensitive system for documenting living traditions. By translating the complexity of ikat knowledge into semantic data patterns, the study provides a model for intelligent cultural heritage documentation. The key contribution lies in bridging indigenous epistemologies with digital infrastructures, enabling scalable cultural preservation without compromising authenticity.
References
1. McIntosh J. Threading Ancestry: Ikat Weaving and Indigenous Knowledge in Eastern Indonesia. London: Routledge; 2021.
2. Smith L, Akagawa N. Intangible Heritage and Digital Technologies. Singapore: Springer; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8468-5
3. Stuart D, Wilson A, Ferguson J. Linked open data for cultural heritage: mapping narratives with AI. Digit Scholarsh Humanit. 2022;37(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqab012
4. Gilliland AJ. Metadata and community knowledge: toward equitable cultural memory. Archival Sci. 2020;20(4):299–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-020-09310-6
5. Boast R. The Machine and the Ghost: Cultural Heritage in the Age of AI. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2023.
6. Chianese A, Piccialli F. Smart cultural heritage and tourism: a survey. J Herit Tour. 2020;15(3):223–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2020.1731117
7. Dockerty C, Kristiansen A, Bentzen C. Ethical AI in heritage conservation. Int J Herit Stud. 2021;27(9):892–909. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1757578
8. Tenzer L, Gunaratne S, Rai A. AI for cultural preservation: opportunities and risks in Indigenous contexts. AI Soc. 2023;38:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01538-2
9. Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O. The Semantic Web. Sci Am. 2001;284(5):34–43. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0501-34
10. Heath T, Bizer C. Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space. Morgan & Claypool; 2011. https://doi.org/10.2200/S00334ED1V01Y201102WBE001
11. Allemang D, Hendler J. Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist: Effective Modeling in RDFS and OWL. 2nd ed. Burlington (MA): Morgan Kaufmann; 2011.
12. Gilliland AJ. Metadata and community knowledge: toward equitable cultural memory. Archival Sci. 2020;20(4):299–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-020-09310-6
13. Bizer C, Heath T, Berners-Lee T. Linked data—The story so far. Int J Semant Web Inf Syst. 2009;5(3):1–22. https://doi.org/10.4018/jswis.2009081901
14. Doerr M, Crofts N. Electronic cultural heritage in the semantic web. In: Styliaras G, Tzolakis H, Tzovaras D, editors. Handbook of Research on Emerging Technologies for Digital Preservation and Information Modeling. Hershey: IGI Global; 2018. p.78–94. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2918-8.ch004
15. Tenzer L, Gunaratne S, Rai A. AI for cultural preservation: opportunities and risks in Indigenous contexts. AI Soc. 2023;38:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01538-2
16. Stuart D, Wilson A, Ferguson J. Linked open data for cultural heritage: mapping narratives with AI. Digit Scholarsh Humanit. 2022;37(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqab012
17. Dockerty C, Kristiansen A, Bentzen C. Ethical AI in heritage conservation. Int J Herit Stud. 2021;27(9):892–909. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1757578
18. Latour B. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
19. Law J. Actor network theory and material semiotics. In: Turner BS, editor. The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. 3rd ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. p.141–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444304992.ch9
20. Callon M. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In: Law J, editor. Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge; 1986. p.196–233.
21. Woolgar S. Configuring the user: the case of usability trials. Sociol Rev. 1990;38(S1):58–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03349.x
22. Law J, Hassard J. Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell; 1999.
23. Yaneva A. Making the social hold: towards an actor-network theory of design. Des Cult. 2009;1(3):273–88. https://doi.org/10.2752/175470709X455207
24. Neyland S. Organizational Ethnography. London: Sage; 2008.
25. Tenzer L, Gunaratne S, Rai A. AI for cultural preservation: opportunities and risks in Indigenous contexts. AI Soc. 2023;38:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01538-2
26. Dockerty C, Kristiansen A, Bentzen C. Ethical AI in heritage conservation. Int J Herit Stud. 2021;27(9):892–909. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1757578
27. Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O. The Semantic Web. Sci Am. 2001;284(5):34–43. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0501-34
28. Kress G, van Leeuwen T. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2006.
29. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2018.
30. Smith L, Akagawa N. Intangible Heritage and Digital Technologies. Singapore: Springer; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8468-5
31. Tenzer L, Gunaratne S, Rai A. AI for cultural preservation: opportunities and risks in Indigenous contexts. AI & Society. 2023;38:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146 022 01538 2
32. Doerr M, Crofts N. Electronic cultural heritage in the semantic web. In: Styliaras G, Tzolakis H, Tzovaras D, editors. Handbook of Research on Emerging Technologies for Digital Preservation and Information Modeling. Hershey (PA): IGI Global; 2018. p. 78–94. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2918-8.ch004Geertz C. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books; 1973.
33. Boast R. The Machine and the Ghost: Cultural Heritage in the Age of AI. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2023.
34. Smith J. Hybrid Ethnographic Methods in Digital Cultural Research. London: Routledge; 2021.
35. Tan L, Duarte M. AI and cultural heritage: toward ethical machine-readable knowledge systems. Digit Humanit Q. 2022;16(3):1–20. https://doi.org/10.5070/DHQ.16.3.10
36. de Souza AHC, Lima PF. AI and cultural knowledge representation: challenges of Indigenous epistemologies. J Digit Anthropol. 2023;10(2):55–70.
37. Latour B. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
38. Tenzer L, Gunaratne S, Rai A. AI for cultural preservation: opportunities and risks in Indigenous contexts. AI Soc. 2023;38:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01538-2
39. Stuart D, Wilson A, Ferguson J. Linked open data for cultural heritage: mapping narratives with AI. Digit Scholarsh Humanit. 2022;37(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqab012
40. Gilliland AJ. Metadata and community knowledge: toward equitable cultural memory. Archival Sci. 2020;20(4):299–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-020-09310-6
41. Doerr M, Crofts N. Electronic cultural heritage in the semantic web. In: Styliaras G, Tzolakis H, Tzovaras D, editors. Handbook of Research on Emerging Technologies for Digital Preservation and Information Modeling. Hershey: IGI Global; 2018. p.78–94. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2918-8.ch004
42. Gradmann S. Knowledge = metadata + links: the Semantic Web vision and the future of cultural heritage. Bull IEEE Tech Comm Digit Libr. 2010;6(3):1–9.
43. Christen L. Sensitive metadata practices in Indigenous contexts. First Monday. 2021;26(6). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i6.11282
44. Dockerty C, Kristiansen A, Bentzen C. Ethical AI in heritage conservation. Int J Herit Stud. 2021;27(9):892–909. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2020.1757578
45. Barwick JA, Maloney M. Designing cultural knowledge graphs for living heritage. Int J Digit Libr. 2024;25(2):123–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00799-023-00345-z
46. Nuryanto UW, Basrowi, Quraysin I, Pratiwi I. Environmental management control system, blockchain adoption, cleaner production, and product efficiency on environmental reputation and performance: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. Sustain Futur [Internet]. 2024;7:100190. Tersedia pada: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188824000406
47. Nuryanto UW, Basrowi, Quraysin I, Pratiwi I. Magnitude of digital adaptability role: Stakeholder engagement and costless signaling in enhancing sustainable MSME performance. Heliyon [Internet]. 2024;10(13):e33484. Tersedia pada: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33484
48. Marwanto IGGH, Basrowi, Suwarno. The Influence of Culture and Social Structure on Political Behavior in the Election of Mayor of Kediri Indonesia. Int J Adv Sci Technol [Internet]. 15 April 2020;29(05 SE-Articles):1035–47. Tersedia pada: http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/9759
49. Basrowi, Ali H, Suyanto T. Customer Satisfaction Modelling of The Indonesia. Int J Sci Appl Sci Conf Ser P-ISSN [Internet]. 2022;6(2):2549–4635. Tersedia pada: http://jurnal.uns.ac.id/ijsascs
50. Suseno BD, Sutisna, Hidyat S, Basrowi. Halal supply chain and halal tourism industry in forming economic growth Bambang. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2018;6(4):407–22.
51. Basrowi B, Utami P. Building Strategic Planning Models Based on Digital Technology in the Sharia Capital Market. J Adv Res Law Econ Vol 11 No 3 JARLE Vol XI Issue 3(49) Summer 2020DO - 1014505/jarle.v113(49)06 [Internet]. 15 Juni 2020; Tersedia pada: https://journals.aserspublishing.eu/jarle/article/view/5154
52. Soenyono S, Basrowi B. Form and Trend of Violence against Women and the Legal Protection Strategy. Int J Adv Sci Technol [Internet]. 25 April 2020;29(05 SE-Articles):3165–74. Tersedia pada: http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/11636
53. Marwanto IGGH, Basrowi B, Suwarno S. The Influence of Culture and Social Structure on Political Behavior in the Election of Mayor of Kediri Indonesia. Int J Adv Sci Technol [Internet]. 15 April 2020;29(05 SE-Articles):1035–47. Tersedia pada: http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/9759
54. Suwarno Basrowi, IGGHM. Technology of Qualitative Analysis to Understand Community Political Behaviors in Regional Head Election in Wates District, Kediri, Indonesia. Int J Adv Sci Technol [Internet]. 23 April 2020;29(05 SE-Articles):2624–35. Tersedia pada: http://sersc.org/journals/index.php/IJAST/article/view/11159
55. Hadi R, Shafrani YS, Hilyatin DL, Riyadi S, Basrowi B. Digital zakat management, transparency in zakat reporting, and the zakat payroll system toward zakat management accountability and its implications on zakat growth acceleration. Int J Data Netw Sci. 2019;8(1):103–8.
56. Yusuf ZFA, Yusuf FA, Nuryanto UW, Basrowi B. Assessing organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in ensuring the smoothness of the supply chain for medical hospital needs towards a green hospital : Evidence from Indonesia. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2024;12(1):181–94.
57. Miar M, Rizani A, Pardede RL, Basrowi B. Analysis of the effects of capital expenditure and supply chain on economic growth and their implications on the community welfare of districts and cities in central Kalimantan province. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2024;12(1):489–504.
58. Alexandro R, Basrowi B. Measuring the effectiveness of smart digital organizations on digital technology adoption : An em- pirical study of educational organizations in Indonesia. Int J Data Netw Sci. 2024;8(1):139–50.
59. Purwaningsih E, Muslikh M, Suhaeri S, Basrowi B. Utilizing blockchain technology in enhancing supply chain efficiency and export performance , and its implications on the financial performance of SMEs. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2024;12(1):449–60.
60. Hamdan H, Basrowi B. Do community entrepreneurial development shape the sustainability of tourist villages? Hamdana*. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2024;12(1):407–22.
61. Junaidi A, Masdar A Zum, Basrowi B, Robiatun D, Situmorang JW, Lukas A, et al. Uncertain Supply Chain Management Enhancing sustainable soybean production in Indonesia : evaluating the environmental and economic benefits of MIGO technology for integrated supply chain sustainability. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2024;12(1):221–34.
62. Alexandro R, Basrowi B. The influence of macroeconomic infrastructure on supply chain smoothness and national competitiveness and its implications on a country ’ s economic growth : evidence from BRICS. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2024;12(1):167–80.
63. Nuryanto UW, Basrowi B, Quraysin I. Big data and IoT adoption in shaping organizational citizenship behavior: The role of innovation organiza- tional predictor in the chemical manufacturing industry. Int J Data Netw Sci. 2019;8(1):103–8.
64. Junaidi A, Basrowi B, Sabtohadi J, Wibowo AM, Wiboho SS, Asgar A, et al. The role of public administration and social media educational socialization in influencing public satisfaction on population services : The mediating role of population literacy awareness. Int J Data Netw Sci. 2024;8(1):345–56.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Laely Indah Lestari, Evi Novianti, Dadang Sugiana, Ute Lies Siti Khadijah (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
