Design of a Risk Scoring System for Post Surgical Adverse Events on Neuro-oncological patients

Authors

  • Rodrigo Lagos Clinical Epidemiology Research, Department of Cancer Research, Instituto Oncológico Fundación Arturo López-Pérez Author
  • Matías Espinoza Medical Informatics and Data Science, Department of Cancer Research, Instituto Oncológico Fundación Arturo López-Pérez Author
  • Alejandro Cubillos Neurosurgery, Surgical Oncology, Instituto Oncológico Fundación Arturo López-Pérez Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2023125

Keywords:

Risk Scoring System, Neuro-Oncology, Post-Surgical Adverse Events

Abstract

This paper aims to validate and subsequently design a Risk Scoring System based on Lohman et al.(14) risk calculator for patients undergoing brain or spinal tumor surgery. Three models were tested: replication of Lohman's methodology, modification of risk groups, and development of a custom risk calculator. The replication of Lohman's instrument did not show significant correlations with adverse events in the study population. However, the adapted risk calculator demonstrated promising predictive performance for unplanned reoperation at 30 days, indicating good utility. The study suggests the potential applicability of the adapted risk calculator for predicting unplanned reoperation within 30 days for patients undergoing brain or spinal tumor surgery. Further research with larger samples and less missing data is recommended to confirm and enhance the utility of the proposed risk calculator. The results could be used to optimize decision-making and improve the quality of care for neuro-oncological surgery patients

References

1. Dasenbrock HH, Liu KX, Devine CA, Chavakula V, Smith TR, Gormley WB, et al. Length of hospital stay after craniotomy for tumor: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;39(6).

2. Schipmann S, Schwake M, Suero Molina E, Roeder N, Steudel WI, Warneke N, et al. Quality Indicators in Cranial Neurosurgery: Which Are Presently Substantiated? A Systematic Review. World Neurosurg [Internet]. 2017;104:104–12. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.

3. Schipmann S, Schwake M, Suero Molina E, Roeder N, Steudel WI, Warneke N, et al. Quality Indicators in Cranial Neurosurgery: Which Are Presently Substantiated? A Systematic Review. World Neurosurg [Internet]. 2017;104:104–12. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.1

4. Karhade A V., Vasudeva VS, Dasenbrock HH, Lu Y, Gormley WB, Groff MW, et al. Thirty-day readmission and reoperation after surgery for spinal tumors: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis. Neurosurg Focus. 2016;41(2).

5. Schoenfeld AJ, Le H V., Marjoua Y, Leonard DA, Belmont PJ, Bono CM, et al. Assessing the utility of a clinical prediction score regarding 30-day morbidity and mortality following metastatic spinal surgery: the New England Spinal Metastasis Score (NESMS). Spine J [Internet]. 2016;16(4):482–90. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.09.043

6. Ramesh VJ, Rao GSU, Guha A, Thennarasu K. Evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring systems for predicting the mortality in elective neurosurgical patients. Br J Neurosurg. 2008;22(2):275–8.

7. Kuan EC, Badran KW, Yoo F, Bhandarkar ND, Haidar YM, Tjoa T, et al. Predictors of Short-term Morbidity and Mortality in Open Anterior Skull Base Surgery. Laryngoscope. 2019 Jun 1;129(6):1407–12.

8. Reponen E, Korja M, Niemi T, Silvasti-Lundell M, Hernesniemi J, Tuominen H. Preoperative identification of neurosurgery patients with a high risk of in-hospital complications: A prospective cohort of 418 consecutive elective craniotomy patients. J Neurosurg [Internet]. 2015 Sep 1 [cited 2022 Jan 19];123(3):594–604. Available from: https://thejns.org/view/journals/j-neurosurg/123/3/article-p594.xml

9. Jimenez A, Khalafallah AM, Huq S, Pollock J. A Novel Online Calculator for Hospital Length of Stay in Brain Tumor Patients Trends in US Spinal Surgery : A 6 Year Analysis on Laminectomies Pre-operative Urinary Tract Infection Increases Post-Operative Morbidity in Spine Patients. 2020;67(1):2020.

10. Vaziri S, Wilson J, Abbatematteo J, Kubilis P, Chakraborty S, Kshitij K, et al. Predictive performance of the American College of Surgeons universal risk calculator in neurosurgical patients. J Neurosurg. 2018;128(3):942–7.

11. Gibula, D. R., Singh, A. B., Bronsert, M. R., Henderson, W. G., Battaglia, C., Hammermeister, K. E., Glebova, N. O, Meguid, R. A. Surgery (2019), 812-819, 166(5).AccuratePreoperativePrediction of Unplanned 30-Day PostoperativeReadmissionUsing 8 predictor variables.

12. Inastrilla CRA. Data Visualization in the Information Society. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education 2023;2:25–25. https://doi.org/10.56294/mw202325

13. Canova-Barrios C, Machuca-Contreras F. Interoperability standards in Health Information Systems: systematic review. Seminars in Medical Writing and Education 2022;1:7–7. https://doi.org/10.56294/mw20227

14. Lohmann S, Brix T, Varghese J, Warneke N, Schwake M, Molina ES, et al. Development and validation of prediction scores for nosocomial infections, reoperations, and adverse events in the daily clinical setting of neurosurgical patients with cerebral and spinal tumors. J Neurosurg. 2021;134(4):1226–36.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-12

Issue

Section

Original

How to Cite

1.
Lagos R, Espinoza M, Cubillos A. Design of a Risk Scoring System for Post Surgical Adverse Events on Neuro-oncological patients. Data and Metadata [Internet]. 2023 Dec. 12 [cited 2024 Dec. 21];2:125. Available from: https://dm.ageditor.ar/index.php/dm/article/view/143