Learning styles and academic performance in engineering students: A pre- and pos-pandemic bibliometric study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2025197Keywords:
learning styles, academic performance, engineering, science mapping, VOSviewer, SCOPUSAbstract
Introduction: The relationship between learning styles and academic performance has gained significant attention, particularly in engineering education, as it plays an important role in enhancing the quality of the learning process. This study aims to provide a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of research trends in this field, focusing on pre- and post-pandemic periods. Methods: A total of 1397 articles from the Scopus database were analyzed using VOSviewer software to map the scientific production until 2023. The analysis was divided into two periods: 2016-2019 and 2020-2023, identifying clústers of research focused on learning styles, academic performance, and the growing importance of e-learning post-pandemic.
Results: Five main clústers were identified between 2016-2019, including learning styles, the development of evaluation instruments, psychological aspects, curricular development, and general learning. In the post-pandemic period, three dominant clústers emerged, focused on learning styles, academic performance, and e-learning. Co-authorship analysis revealed changes in collaboration patterns, with increased global cooperation, particularly in the United States, China, and Spain during the 2020-2023 period. Conclusions: The study highlights the increasing relevance of research on learning styles and the shift toward remote learning triggered by the pandemic. These findings underscore the need for further exploration of adaptive teaching strategies to diverse learning preferences in the evolving educational landscape.
References
1. Cimermanová I. The Effect of Learning Styles on Academic Achievement in Different Forms of Teaching. 2018;11(3):219–32.
2. Baños R, Ortiz-Camacho M del M, Baena-Extremera A, Tristán-Rodríguez JL. Satisfacción, motivación y rendimiento académico en estudiantes de Secundaria y Bachillerato: antecedentes, diseño, metodología y propuesta de análisis para un trabajo de investigación. Espiral Cuadernos Del Profesorado. 2017;10(20):40–50.
3. Jung CG. Tipos psicológicos. TROTTA E, editor. Madrid - España; 2013. 651 p.
4. Krech D, Crutchfield S, Ballachey E. Psicología social. Nueva B, editor. Madrid-España; 1972.
5. Bruner J. Toward a Theory of Instruction. Londres-Inglaterra: Library of Congress Catalog Card Nuember 66-13179; 1961.
6. Ausubel D, Novak J, Hanesian H. Psicología educativa: un punto de vista cognoscitivo. Chile: Trillas; 1983.
7. Sperry RW. Organization and Behavior. Science 133; 1961. 1749–1757 p.
8. Kolb AY, Kolb DA. Experiential Learning Theory. In: Seel, N.M. In Boston-MA: Encyclopedi of the Sciences of Learning; 2012.
9. Romo Aliste ME, López Real D, López Bravo I. ¿Eres visual, auditivo o kinestésico? Estilos de aprendizaje desde el modelo de la Programación Neurolingüística (PNL). Revista Iberoamericana de Educación. 2006;38(2):1–10.
10. Dunn K, Dunn RS. Teaching Students Through Their Individual Learning Styles: A Practical Approach. 1978;
11. Gardner H. Multiple Intelligences [Internet]. New Horizons; 1983. Available from: https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/howard-e-gardner/multiple-intelligences/9780465047680/?lens=basic-books
12. Felder RM, Silverman L. Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education. Engr Education. 1988;78(7)(August):674–681.
13. Chávez Galavíz Á, Mirón Hernández L, Carmona de la Rosa J, Sánchez García A, Hernández Méndez C. Caracterización del estilo de pensamiento: Caso alumnos de Ingeniería Civil del Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Tlatlauquitepec (ITSTL). Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar. 2023;7(6):751–70.
14. Fleming N, Mills C. Modelo VARK: sistemas de representación [Internet]. Share & Embed; 2000. Available from: https://nanopdf.com/download/modelo-vark-sistemas-de-representacion-desarrollado-por_pdf
15. Brookes BC. The foundations of information science. Part I. Philosophical aspects. J Inf Sci [Internet]. 1980 Jun 1;2(3–4):125–33. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/016555158000200302
16. Magulod GC. Learning styles, study habits and academic performance of Filipino university students in applied science courses: Implications for instruction. J Technol Sci Educ. 2019;9(2):184–98.
17. World Economic Forum. The COVID-19 pandemic has changed education forever. This is how. 2020;
18. World Economic Forum. These 3 charts show the global growth in online learning. 2022;
19. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523–38.
20. Calderón Tapia XA, Montero Muthre CA. Estilos de aprendizaje (VAK) en estudiantes del colegio fiscal técnico primero de junio, parroquia rural Tenguel-Ecuador, 2022. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar. 2022;6(5):3733–44.
21. Díaz-Serrano J, Alfageme-González MB. Interacción del rendimiento académico con los estilos de aprendizaje y de enseñanza Interaction of academic performance with learning and teaching styles. 2022;
22. Calderón Tapia XA, Montero Muthre CA. Estilos de aprendizaje (VAK) en estudiantes del colegio fiscal técnico primero de junio, parroquia rural Tenguel-Ecuador, 2022. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar. 2022;6(5):3733–44.
23. Batista-Casacó AR, RuthÁlvarez-Sánchez A, Monge-Freile MF, Mendoza-Zambrano A. El aprendizaje desarrollador desde la perspectiva de la asignatura Sanidad Animal. 2023;
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fernando Ramírez, Silvia Arciniega, Stefany Flores, José Jácome, Mateo Chancosi (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.