Training projects, Virtual Education and Pandemic by COVID-19: from opportunity analysis to strategic decision making
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/dm202278Keywords:
Training Projects, Sustainable Social Development, Socio-Training, Didactic Planning, Socio-Training Evaluation, Virtual Education, Health Sciences, Health AdministrationAbstract
During the Covid-19 pandemic, higher education went from face-to-face to virtual for more than two years in Mexico. During this time, various strategies and approaches were tested, but the progress regarding the level of implementation in the training projects is unknown. That is why the purpose of this study was to determine the level of application of training projects in virtual education. The qualitative approach of documentary review was used as a methodology, observing 25 didactic plans, corresponding to the same number of university teachers. A socioformative analytical rubric was used, which allowed determining the level of performance, achievements and areas of opportunity. In this regard, it was found that the level of progress, in general, was between low and medium for the various indicators. The elements with the best advances in project work were: the identification of the curricular elements, the organization of activities in sequence and the formative evaluation, without reaching high levels. The worst addressed aspects, on the other hand, were: the organization of the students, the approach to a problem of the context and the resources. In future research, it is suggested to increase the sample and carry out extensive quantitative analyses
References
1. Martínez C. Distance education: its characteristics and necessity in current education. Educa.2008 17(33): 1.
2. UNESCO. Education for All, 2000-2015: achievements and challenges;EFA global monitoring report, 2015 - UNESCO Digital Library (524). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000232435
3. IIESAC. COVID-19 and higher education: From immediate effects to the day after.2020; Unesco, 57. http://www.iesalc.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/COVID-19-060420-ES-2.pdf
4. Castillo Y, García N, Corredor M, Malaver C, Elizabeth C. Evolution of distance higher education: challenges and opportunities for its management. Revi Virt Unive Catól Del Nor.2017; 0(50): 81-105.
5. Navarrete-Cazales Z, Manzanilla-Granados H. Panorama of distance education in Mexico. Latin Ameri Jour of Educat Stud.2017; 13(1): 65-82.
6. Monroy A, Hernández I A, Jiménez M. Digital classrooms in higher education: The case of Mexico. Forma Univer.2018; 11(5): 93-104. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50062018000500093
7. Rincon Soto IB, Sanchez Leon NS. How artificial intelligence will shape the future of metaverse. A qualitative perspective. Metaverse Basic and Applied Research. 2022;1:12. https://doi.org/10.56294/mr202212
8. Cardona S, Vèlez, J, Tobòn S. Formative Projects and Assessment with Rubrics. Revi Parad.2019; XXXVI: 9-25.
9. Laguado E, Villamizar M. Development of the pedagogical strategy "Proyectos Formativos" to promote the integrality of disciplinary knowledge. Rev Cub de Enfer. 2016; 32(4): 126-136.
10. Gonzalez-Argote J. Use of virtual reality in rehabilitation. Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation / Rehabilitacion Interdisciplinaria. 2022;2:24. https://doi.org/10.56294/ri202224
11. Martínez, J., Gallegos, E., & García, L. Formative projects: a strategy to promote collaborative work in higher education: Voc de la educ. 2020;5(10);32-44.
12. Silva-Sánchez CA. Psychometric properties of an instrument to assess the level of knowledge about artificial intelligence in university professors. Metaverse Basic and Applied Research. 2022;1:14. https://doi.org/10.56294/mr202214
13. Tobón S, Juárez-Hernández L G, Herrera-Meza S R, Núñez C. Pedagogical practices: Design and validation of SOCME-10 rubric in teachers who have recently entered basic education. Psicol Educa.2021; 27(2): 155-165. https://doi.org/10.5093/psed2021a13
14. Tobón S, Martínez J, Valdez E, Quiriz T. Pedagogical practices: analysis through conceptual mapping. Espa.2018; 39(53):16.
15. Jaramillo-Rincón S, Durante E, Trujillo-Mejía A, Sánchez-Mateus E. Teaching beyond skills: The psychological effect of a simulation training in the COVID 19 era. Interamerican Journal of Health Sciences. 2021;(1). https://doi.org/10.59471/ijhsc202147
16. Tobón S, Luna-nemecio J. Complex thinking and sustainable social development: Validity and reliability of the complex-21 scale. Sustaina.2020: 13(12). doi:10.3390/su13126591
17. Carranza Y, Ramos C, Gómez D. Documentary review. Revista Chakiñan. 2016:46-56.
18. Guareca R, Blásquez L, López I. Qualitative research guide. In News.Ge. 2016 http://www.ler.uam.mx/work/models/UAMLerma/Resource/290/1/images/guia_investigacion_cualitativa_etnografia.pdf
19. Díaz Esquivel AM, Valdés del Pino AM, Fajardo Martínez G de la C. Folleto complementario sobre: Medio ambiente y salud. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias. 2022;1(3):328. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf2022328
20. Tobón S, Pimienta-Prieto J, Herrera-Meza S, Juárez-hernández L G, Hernández-Mosqueda J S. Validity and reliability of a rubric for high school teachers' pedagogical practices assessment (SOCME-10). Espac.2018; 39(53).
21. Albarracín Vanoy RJ. STEM Education as a Teaching Method for the Development of XXI Century Competencies. Metaverse Basic and Applied Research. 2022;1:21. https://doi.org/10.56294/mr202221
22. Salazar-Gómez E, Tobón S. Documentary analysis of the training process of teachers according to the knowledge society. Espac.2018; 39(53).
23. Lepez CO. La educación superior argentina en la pandemia por COVID-19 y en la pospandemia. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología. 2021;1:16. https://doi.org/10.56294/saludcyt202116
24. Moreno-Candil D, Bravo-Verdugo E R, Burgos-Dávila C J, Grijalva-Verdugo A A. Higher education and pandemic: pilot study of the educational experience questionnaire during pandemic. Revi Digi de Investig En Doce Universi.2021; 15(1): e1347. https://doi.org/10.19083/10.19083/ridu.2021.1347
25. Ortega Ortigoza D, Rodríguez Rodríguez J, Mateos-Inchaurrondo A. Higher education and COVID-19: methodological adaptation and online assessment in two universities in Barcelona. Revi Digit de Invest En Doce Univer.2021; 15(1): e1275. https://doi.org/10.19083/10.19083/ridu.2021.1275
26. Rodríguez, G, Suárez J. Graduate education in the face of the new scenario generated by COVID-19. Medi Educa. 2021; 34(4).
27. Ninno JN. Continuing Medical Professional Development, a look beyond the individual. Interamerican Journal of Health Sciences. 2022;(2):121. https://doi.org/10.59471/ijhsc2022121
28. Scorsolini-Comin F, Patias N, Cozzer A, Flores P, Von Hohendorff J. Mental health and coping strategies in graduate students in the COVID-19 pandemic. Revi Lati-Ameri de Enfer.2021; 29. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.5012.3491
29. Corrales Pérez R. Impacto de las lesiones domésticas en la salud pediátrica: una perspectiva epidemiológica. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnología - Serie de Conferencias. 2022;1(2):30. https://doi.org/10.56294/sctconf202230
30. Garayar-Peceros H, Prado-Martínez F, Cortez-Soto A. G, Niño de Guzmán S, García-Gutiérrez J G, Alarco J J. Attitudes towards pandemic and its relationship with resilience in Peruvian medical students. Investi En Educ Méd. 2021; 10(39):43-51. https://doi.org/10.22201/fm.20075057e.2021.39.21351
31. Penissi A. Importance of basic research in the academic training of health science students. Interamerican Journal of Health Sciences. 2021;(1). https://doi.org/10.59471/ijhsc202134
32. Tobón S, Luna-Nemecio J. Proposal for a new talent concept based on socioformation. Educa Philo and Theo.2021; 53(1): 21-33. https://orcid.org/10.1080/00131857.2020.1725885
33. Cardona S, Velez J, Tobon S. Towards a model for assessing competencies. Pap prese at the 2013 8th Compu Colom Confer. 20138; CCC: 2013. htpps://doi.org/10.1109/ColombianCC.2013.6637525Retrievedfrom
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Sonia Meneses Martínez, Sergio Tobón Tobón, Aracelli del Carmen Gonzales-Sánchez, Gabriela López-Quesada, Rafael Romero-Carazas (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
