Comprehensive Continuous Education Plan for Remote Learning in Emergency Situations: Proposal Aimed at High School Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2024.211Keywords:
Virtual learning, Teacher training, Remote education, Active methodologies, Educational technologyAbstract
Remote education faces significant challenges, including the need for adequate technological infrastructure and pedagogical adaptations to maintain educational quality in crisis situations. This study proposes to develop a comprehensive methodology in Moodle to optimize high school education in virtual environments, facilitating teachers' adaptation to remote teaching and improving educational resilience. Using a descriptive and propositional approach, a systematic literature review was conducted in academic databases, and techniques such as Project-Based Learning, Flipped Classroom, Gamification, Microlearning, and Design Thinking were proposed. The results indicate that the methodology improves the implementation of active teaching methods and emphasizes the importance of ongoing teacher training and curricular development. In conclusion, the proposal seeks to transform the educational paradigm towards one that is more resilient and adaptable, ensuring the continuity and quality of education in virtual environments
References
1. Bonilla-Jurado D, Zumba E, Lucio-Quintana A, Yerbabuena-Torres C, Ramírez-Casco A, Guevara C. Advancing University Education: Exploring the Benefits of Education for Sustainable Development. Sustainability. 2024 Sep 9;16(17):7847.
2. Mhlongo S, Mbatha K, Ramatsetse B, Dlamini R. Challenges, opportunities, and prospects of adopting and using smart digital technologies in learning environments: An iterative review. Heliyon. 2023;
3. Bonilla-Jurado D, Guevara C, Montero IKS, Pazmiño SJI, Zuta MEC. The triple helix model linked to knowledge transfer and economic progress from universities. Salud, Ciencia y Tecnologia. 2023 Jan 1;3.
4. Enrique Hinostroza J. New challenges for ICT in education policies in developing countries: The need to account for the widespread use of ICT for teaching and learning outside the school. ICT-supported innovations in small countries and developing regions: Perspectives and recommendations for international education. 2018;99–119.
5. Barbour MK, LaBonte R, Hodges CB, Moore S, Lockee BB, Trust T, et al. Understanding pandemic pedagogy: Differences between emergency remote, remote, and online teaching. State of the Nation: K-12 e-Learning in Canada. 2020;
6. Sinchigalo-Martínez R, Guzmán-Barcenes B, Bonilla-Jurado D. Bienestar emocional y rendimiento académico en estudiantes universitarios: relación bidimensional y su impacto en las estrategias de apoyo. JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND RESEARCH [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 Jul 18];7(4):71–95. Available from: https://zenodo.org/record/8008096
7. Nguyen TTH. Implementing digital techniques to stimulate EFL students’ engagement: A case study in Vietnam. International Journal of TESOL & Education. 2021;1(3):105–29.
8. Baran E, Correia AP, Thompson A. Transforming online teaching practice: Critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers. Distance education. 2011;32(3):421–39.
9. González MO. La capacitación docente para una educación remota de emergencia por la pandemia de la COVID-19. Revista Tecnología, Ciencia y Educación. 2021 May 4;81–102.
10. Fernández-Regueira U, Gewerc A, Llamas-Nistal M. El profesorado universitario de galicia y la enseñanza remota de emergencia: condiciones y contradicciones. Campus Virtuales [Internet]. 2020;9(2):2020. Available from: www.revistacampusvirtuales.es
11. Bonilla-Jurado DM, Zambrano RN, Moncayo HL. Desarrollo profesional continuo de docentes para actividades en los Institutos Tecnológicos: una revisión literaria. Revista Científica UISRAEL. 2023 Jan 10;10(1):27–39.
12. Portillo SA, Castellanos LI, Reynoso ÓU, Gavotto OI. Enseñanza remota de emergencia ante la pandemia Covid-19 en Educación Media Superior y Educación Superior. Propósitos y Representaciones. 2020;8(SPE3).
13. Centeno-Caamal R, Acuña-Gamboa LA. Competencias digitales docentes y formación continua: una propuesta desde el paradigma cualitativo. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa - RELATEC. 2023 Jul 21;22(2):119–34.
14. Miguel J, Sofía G, Cabeza G. Planificar la educación en la pospandemia: de la educación remota de emergencia a los modelos híbridos [Internet]. 2020. Available from: http://www.flacso.edu.uy/publicaciones/edutic2020/garcia_garcia_tecnologias_en_y_
15. Guo P, Saab N, Post LS, Admiraal W. A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. Int J Educ Res. 2020;102:101586.
16. Bessa BR, Santos S, Duarte BJ. Toward effectiveness and authenticity in PBL: A proposal based on a virtual learning environment in computing education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education. 2019;27(2):452–71.
17. Bonilla D, Alulima L, Hallo D, López O. La nueva normalidad y el uso del método hermenéutico en las investigaciones en el período pospandémico desde una perspectiva teórica. Gicos [Internet]. 2021;6(2):145–54. Available from: http://erevistas.saber.ula.ve/index.php/gicos/article/view.
18. Boubih S, Aidoun A, El Alaoui M, Idrissi RJ. The effectiveness of the Flipped Classroom in a teacher training context. Universal Journal of Educational Research. 2020;8(11B):6061–71.
19. Ekineh DR. Flipped Learning as an innovative teaching model in the 21st Century. Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences Journal of Mathematics, and Science Education [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2024 May 15];3(2):11–9. Available from: https://www.fnasjournals.com/index.php/FNAS-JMSE/article/view/52
20. Tomas L, Evans NS, Doyle T, Skamp K. Are first year students ready for a flipped classroom? A case for a flipped learning continuum. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2019;16(1):1–22.
21. Al-Samarraie H, Shamsuddin A, Alzahrani AI. A flipped classroom model in higher education: a review of the evidence across disciplines. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2020;68(3):1017–51.
22. Lara A, Lara N, Lara G, Bonilla D. Aprendizaje basado en problemas como estrategia significativa en la formación académica. Universidad, Ciencia y Tecnología. 2020;(1):142–9.
23. Jiang MY chao, Jong MS yung, Lau WW fat, Chai C sing, Liu KS xia, Park M. A scoping review on flipped classroom approach in language education: challenges, implications and an interaction model. Comput Assist Lang Learn. 2022;35(5–6):1218–49.
24. Landers RN, Auer EM, Collmus AB, Armstrong MB. Gamification science, its history and future: Definitions and a research agenda. Simul Gaming. 2018;49(3):315–37.
25. Behl A, Jayawardena N, Pereira V, Islam N, Del Giudice M, Choudrie J. Gamification and e-learning for young learners: A systematic literature review, bibliometric analysis, and future research agenda. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2022;176:121445.
26. Gomes JRV. Serious game for promoting health data literacy using the Inven! RA analytics architecture. 2023 [cited 2024 May 15]; Available from: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/152136
27. Asad MM, Malik A. Cybergogy paradigms for technology-infused learning in higher education 4.0: a critical analysis from global perspective. Education+ Training. 2023;65(6/7):871–90.
28. Betts K, Delaney B, Galoyan T, Lynch W. Historical review of distance and online education from 1700s to 2021 in the United States: Instructional design and pivotal pedagogy in higher education. Journal of Online Learning Research and Practice. 2021;8(1).
29. Lalaleo-Analuisa FR, Bonilla-Jurado DM, Robles-Salguero RE. Tecnologías de la Información y Comunicación exclusivo para el comportamiento del consumidor desde una perspectiva teórica. Retos. 2021 Mar 29;11(21):147–64.
30. Kim J, Lee H, Cho YH. Learning design to support student-AI collaboration: Perspectives of leading teachers for AI in education. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2022;27(5):6069–104.
31. Herrera-Pavo MÁ. Collaborative learning for virtual higher education. Learn Cult Soc Interact. 2021;28:100437.
32. Le H, Janssen J, Wubbels T. Collaborative learning practices: teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of education. 2018;48(1):103–22.
33. Díaz Redondo RP, Caeiro Rodríguez M, López Escobar JJ, Fernández Vilas A. Integrating micro-learning content in traditional e-learning platforms. Multimed Tools Appl. 2021;80(2):3121–51.
34. Taylor A dung, Hung W. The effects of microlearning: A scoping review. Educational technology research and development. 2022;70(2):363–95.
35. Reynolds ML. Evaluating Microlearning Strategies in the Corporate Environment: A Comparative Mixed Methods Study Using the Kirkpatrick Model. 2023;
36. Dwinggo Samala A, Bojić L, Bekiroğlu D, Watrianthos R, Hendriyani Y. Microlearning: Transforming education with bite-sized learning on the go—insights and applications. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM). 2023;17(21).
37. Bonilla-Jurado D. Entorno organizacional como factor influyente en la implementación del Design Thinking. Información, tecnología y empresas [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2024 Aug 20];8(2):13–47. Available from: http://saber.ucv.ve/ojs/index.php/rev_GID/article/view/26625
38. Leary M, Cacchione PZ, Demiris G, Carthon JMB, Bauermeister JA. An integrative review of human‐centered design and design thinking for the creation of health interventions. In: Nursing Forum. Wiley Online Library; 2022. p. 1137–52.
39. Kwon J, Choi Y, Hwang Y. Enterprise design thinking: An investigation on user-centered design processes in large corporations. Designs (Basel). 2021;5(3):43.
40. Bonilla DM, Lalaleo FR, Salinas DF, Masaquiza CS. Perspectiva teórica de los proyectos de estimulación temprana: un acercamiento a partir del punto metaanalítico. Project, Design and Management. 2019;1(1):77–92.
41. Pratama MP, Sampelolo R, Lura H. Revolutionizing education: harnessing the power of artificial intelligence for personalized learning. Klasikal: Journal of Education, Language Teaching and Science. 2023;5(2):350–7.
42. Bonilla Jurado DM, Zambrano Pintado RN, Moncayo Cueva HL. Desarrollo profesional continuo de docentes para actividades en los Institutos Tecnológicos: una revisión literaria. Revista Científica UISRAEL. 2023 Jan 10;10(1):27–39.
43. Fitria TN. Artificial intelligence (AI) in education: Using AI tools for teaching and learning process. In: Prosiding Seminar Nasional & Call for Paper STIE AAS. 2021. p. 134–47.
44. Onesi-Ozigagun O, Ololade YJ, Eyo-Udo NL, Ogundipe DO. Revolutionizing education through AI: a comprehensive review of enhancing learning experiences. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences. 2024;6(4):589–607.
45. Akintolu M, Dlamini N, Letseka M. Bloom’s taxonomy for the digital age student in a rural African context. EUREKA: Social and Humanities. 2022;6:39–47.
46. Asad MM, Naz A, Churi P, Tahanzadeh MM. Virtual reality as pedagogical tool to enhance experiential learning: a systematic literature review. Educ Res Int. 2021;2021:1–17.
47. Adavi KAK, Acker A. What is a File on a Phone? Personal Information Management Practices Amongst WhatsApp Users. Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact. 2023;7(CSCW2):1–28.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Estela Maribel García Navarro , Jorge Andrés Bautista Samaniego , Ana Julia Quintero Ordóñez , Giselle Lorena Nuñez Nuñez , Wellington Isaac Maliza Cruz (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
