Reciproc blue y wave one gold en conductos curvos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2024.237Keywords:
Filling, Deburring, Root Canal, Reciproc Blue, Wave One GoldAbstract
Introduction: endodontic treatment is performed daily in various health centers by specialists and general dentists, however, the obturation treatment can fail and a deobturation of the materials lodged in the root canals whether straight or curved is required.
Objective: to determine which of the two systems Reciproc Blue and WaveOne Gold is more effective in the deobturation of curved root canals by means of a literature review of related studies.
Method: qualitative and descriptive literature review with scientific articles obtained from the PubMed online database as the study population.
Results: WaveOne Gold presented a minimum time of between 2,03 and 4,9 min in the duration of the cleaning of curved root canals, while Reciproc Blue presented a time between 3,21 and 5,4 min.
Conclusions: it was determined that the two systems Reciproc Blue and WaveOne Gold have a good efficacy in the treatment of deobturation of curved root canals, since they eliminate the materials lodged in these canals after an incorrect obturation, with cleaning percentages higher than 2 %.
References
1. Schuffeneger T. La Ciencia del Retratamiento Endodóntico Ortógrado- Presentación de Tres Casos. Canal Abierto [Internet]. 2020;42(1):32–9. Available from: https://www.canalabierto.cl/storage/articles/October2020/FGcjFxcO3FtYTnFZPhd6.pdf
2. Scavo R, Gersuni C, Oliva S, Salas Romero W. Eficacia de dos sistemas mecanizados para la desobturación de conductos radiculares curvos obturados con GuttaCore. Rev Asoc Odontol Argent [Internet]. 2018;106(1):12–8. Available from: http://fi-admin.bvsalud.org/document/view/n34f7
3. Lara A. Fatiga cíclica en sistemas reciprocantes WaveOne Gold y Reciproc Blue después de su uso en canales con curvaturas severas. OdontoInvestigación. 2021;7(1):38–52.
4. Sierra A, Gómez D, Gajardo F, Correa V. Extrusión Apical de Barro Dentinario e Irrigante Producidos por Dos Sistemas de Instrumentación de Níquel Titanio al Utilizar Irrigación Pasiva o Activa. Int J Odontostomatol [Internet]. 2019;13(1):51–7. Available from: https://www.scielo.cl/pdf/ijodontos/v13n1/0718-381X-ijodontos-13-01-00051.pdf
5. Fuentes R, Arias A, Navarro P, Ottone N, Bucchi C. Morfometría de Premolares Mandibulares en Radiografías Panorámicas Digitales; Análisis de Curvaturas Radiculares Morphometric Study of Mandibular Premolars in Panoramic Digital Radiographs; Analysis of Root Curvatures. Int J Morphol [Internet]. 2015;33(2):476–82. Available from: https://www.scielo.cl/pdf/ijmorphol/v33n2/art12.pdf
6. Hülsmann M, Peters OA, Dummer PMH. Mechanical preparation of root canals: shaping goals, techniques and means. Endod Top [Internet]. 2005;10(1):30–76. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1601-1546.2005.00152.x
7. Correa D, Hidalgo P. Fatiga cíclica de cuatro sistemas reciprocantes en una canaleta dinámica de raíces simuladas. Odontol (Habana) [Internet]. 2020;22(2):45–59. Available from: https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/odontologia/article/view/2384/2535
8. Chaniotis A, Ordinola-Zapata R. Present status and future directions: Management of curved and calcified root canals. Int Endod J [Internet]. 2022;55(S3):656–84. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/iej.13685
9. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol [Internet]. 1971;32(2):271–5. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0030422071902301
10. Lugo C, Galiana M, Montiel N, Gualdoni G. Comportamiento mecánico de los nuevos instrumentos de endodoncia. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Nac (Cordoba) [Internet]. 2019;12(1):24–31. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.30972/rf(
11. Alcalde M, Duarte M, Bramante C, de Vasconselos B, Tanomaru M, Guerreiro J, et al. Cyclic fatigue and torsional strength of three different thermally treated reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments. Clin Oral Investig [Internet]. 2018 May;22(4):1865–71. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29224061/
12. Keskin C, Inan U, Demiral M, Keleş A. Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Reciproc Blue, Reciproc, and WaveOne Gold Reciprocating Instruments. J Endod [Internet]. 2017 Aug;43(8):1360–3. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28662877/
13. Castillo A, Hidalgo M, Guillen E, Caballero V. Permeabilización y transporte del conducto radicular con diferentes instrumentos de preparación inicial. Odontol (Habana) [Internet]. 2022;24(1):1–10. Available from: https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/odontologia/index
14. Uslu G, Özyürek T, Yılmaz K, Gündoğar M. Cyclic fatigue resistance of R-Pilot, HyFlex EDM and PathFile nickel-titanium glide path files in artificial canals with double (S-shaped) curvature. Int Endod J [Internet]. 2018 May;51(5):584–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28856692/
15. Pedrinha V, Brandão J, Pessoa O, Rodrigues P. Influence of File Motion on Shaping, Apical Debris Extrusion and Dentinal Defects: A Critical Review. Open Dent J [Internet]. 2018;12(1):189–201. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842382/pdf/TODENTJ-12-189.pdf
16. Al-Labed H, Layous K, Alzoubi H. The Efficacy of Three Rotary Systems (Reciproc Blue, WaveOne Gold, and AF Blue R3) in Preparing Simulated, Highly Curved Root Canals: An In Vitro Study. Cureus [Internet]. 2022 Oct;14(10):1–11. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36381824/
17. Keskin C, Sivas Yilmaz Ö, Inan U. Apically extruded debris produced during glide path preparation using R-Pilot, WaveOne Gold Glider and ProGlider in curved root canals. Aust Endod J [Internet]. 2020 Dec;46(3):439–44. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32820600/
18. Ramachandran S, Koshy C, Narayanan S, Venkatesh B, Sundaran RM, Karumaran CS. Evaluation of Cleaning Efficacy of S-One and WaveOne File Systems Using Scanning Electron Microscopy Analysis: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract [Internet]. 2020 Aug;21(8):841–5. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33568602/
19. Boetto A, Arce G, Zmener O, Pameijer C, Della-Porta R, Picca M. Ability of two reciprocating Nickel-Titanium instruments for guttapercha/ sealer removal in simulated curved root canals. Acta Odontol Latinoam [Internet]. 2022 Apr;35(1):39–44. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35700540/
20. Yu D, Guo L, Gao J, Liu J, Yang D. Evaluation of apical extrusion of debris and centering ability in different nickel-titanium files during curved root canal preparation. BMC Oral Health [Internet]. 2023 Jun;23(1):395. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37322508/
21. Madarati A, Sammani A, Alnazzawi A, Alrahlah A. Efficiency of the new reciprocating and rotary systems with or without ultrasonics in removing root-canals filling with calcium silicate-based sealer (MTA). BMC Oral Health [Internet]. 2023 Jan;23(1):1–5. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36597070/
22. Wang L, Chen H, Lin R-T, Gu L-S. Influence of pecking frequency at working length on the volume of apically extruded debris: A micro-computed tomography analysis. J Dent Sci [Internet]. 2022 Jul;17(3):1274–80. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35784137/
23. Abduljalil M, Andac G, Basmaci F. Impacts of different Nickel-Titanium rotary and reciprocating root canal preparation systems on the amount of apically extruded debris. Aust Endod J [Internet]. 2023 Sep;49(1):308–14. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36571483/
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Gómez Coba Ronald Medardo, Jhoseline MelissaPérez Villacrés Pérez Villacrés , Manuel PhD Benites Rolando (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
