Validation and invariance of an Individual Work Performance Questionnaire (IWPQ-P) in Peruvian Nurses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2024259Keywords:
Work Performance, Nurses, Invariance, Validation, PeruvianAbstract
Background: performance evaluation is essential to ensure quality healthcare services, especially in the field of nursing.
Objective: The objective of this study was to analyze the factorial structure, reliability, and invariance by sex and age of the work performance scale in Peruvian nurses.
Methods: confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to evaluate the internal structure of the scale, and psychometric properties including reliability and convergent validity were determined. Additionally, factorial invariance was evaluated according to participants' sex and age.
Results: the CFA supported the structure of three factors (Task Performance, Counterproductive Behaviors, Contextual Performance) and showed adequate and stable psychometric properties for a 12-item version (: χ2 = 231,09, df = 78; CFI = 0,97, TLI = 0,96, RMSEA = 0,06 (90 % CI: 0,05-0,06), and SRMR = 0,03). Strict factorial invariance was demonstrated for both sex and age, and adequate internal consistency was found for each dimension, as well as convergent validity.
Conclusions: the work performance scale, in its 12-item version (IWPQ-P), is a valid and reliable measure for evaluating work performance in Peruvian nurses. Its factorial invariance by sex and age makes it a useful tool for future research and practical applications in nursing performance evaluation
References
1. Tong L. Relationship between meaningful work and job performance in nurses. Int J Nurs Pract 2018; 24: e12620.
2. Bernales-Turpo D, Quispe-Velasquez R, Flores-Ticona D, et al. Burnout, Professional Self-Efficacy, and Life Satisfaction asPredictors of Job Performance in Health Care Workers: The Mediating Role of WorkEngagement. J Prim Care Community Health 2022; 13: 215013192211018.
3. Sucapuca C, Morales-García WC, Saintila J. Work-Related Factors Associated With Burnout Among Peruvian Nurses. J Prim Care Community Health 2022; 13: 1–8.
4. AbuAlRub RF. Job stress, job performance, and social support among hospital nurses. Journal of Nursing Scholarship; 36. Epub ahead of print 2004. DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2004.04016.x.
5. Sharma J, Dhar RL. Factors influencing job performance of nursing staff: Mediating role of affective commitment. Pers Rev 2016; 45: 161–182.
6. Tran KT, Nguyen P V., Dang TTU, et al. The impacts of the high-quality workplace relationships on job performance: A perspective on staff nurses in Vietnam. Behav Sci (Basel); 8. Epub ahead of print 2018. DOI: 10.3390/bs8120109.
7. Huaman N, Morales-García WC, Castillo-Blanco R, et al. An Explanatory Model of Work-family Conflict and Resilience as Predictors of Job Satisfaction in Nurses: The Mediating Role of Work Engagement and Communication Skills. J Prim Care Community Health; 14. Epub ahead of print 1 January 2023. DOI: 10.1177/21501319231151380.
8. Bakertzis E, Myloni B. Profession as a major drive of work engagement and its effects on job performance among healthcare employees in Greece: A comparative analysis among doctors, nurses and administrative staff. Heal Serv Manag Res; 34. Epub ahead of print 2021. DOI: 10.1177/0951484820943592.
9. Darvishmotevali M, Ali F. Job insecurity, subjective well-being and job performance: The moderating role of psychological capital. Int J Hosp Manag; 87. Epub ahead of print 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102462.
10. Campbell JP, McCloy RA, Oppler SH, et al. A Theory of Performance. In: Schmitt N, Borman WC (eds) Personnel Selection in Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1993, pp. 35–70.
11. Chura S, Saintila J, Mamani R, et al. Predictors of Depression in Nurses During COVID-19 Health Emergency; the Mediating Role of Resilience: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Prim Care Community Health; 13. Epub ahead of print 2022. DOI: 10.1177/21501319221097075.
12. Campbell JP. Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In: Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 1990.
13. Greenslade JH, Jimmieson NL. Distinguishing between task and contextual performance for nurses: development of a job performance scale. J Adv Nurs 2007; 58: 602–611.
14. Koopmans L, Bernaards C, Hildebrandt V, et al. Development of an individual work performance questionnaire. Int J Product Perform Manag 2012; 62: 6–28.
15. Borman W, Motowidlo S. Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance. In: Schmitt N, Bonnan WC (eds) Personnel Selection in Organizations. San Francisco: Lossey‐Bass, pp. 71–79.
16. Koopmans L, Bernaards CM, Hildebrandt VH, et al. Conceptual frameworks of individual work performance: A systematic review. J Occup Environ Med; 53. Epub ahead of print 2011. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e318226a763.
17. Rotundo M. The relative importance of task, citizenship, and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: a policy-capturing approach. J Appl Psychol; 87. Epub ahead of print 2002. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.1.66.
18. Han JE, Park NH, Cho J. Influence of gender role conflict, resilience, and nursing organizational culture on nursing work performance among clinical nurses. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ; 26. Epub ahead of print 2020. DOI: 10.5977/jkasne.2020.26.3.248.
19. Soriano-Vázquez I, Cajachagua Castro M, Morales-García WC. Emotional intelligence as a predictor of job satisfaction: the mediating role of conflict management in nurses. Front Public Heal; 11. Epub ahead of print 10 November 2023. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1249020.
20. Ricalde-Castillo Y, Celis-Mendoza M, Morales-García M, et al. Sociodemographic Factors, Mental Health, and Emotional Eating Associated With Concern for COVID-19 Contagion in Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Prim Care Community Heal; 14. Epub ahead of print 2023. DOI: 10.1177/21501319231200400.
21. Gabini S, Salessi S. Validación de la escala de rendimiento laboral individual en trabajadores argentinos. Rev Evaluar 2016; 16: 31–44.
22. Koopmans L, Bernaards CM, Hildebrandt VH, et al. Construct validity of the individual work performance questionnaire. J Occup Environ Med; 56. Epub ahead of print 2014. DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000113.
23. Yun Y-M, Yoo M-S. Effects of Emotional Competence, Learning Organization, and Nursing Organization Culture among Nursing Performance of Clinical Nurses. Korean J Heal Serv Manag 2017; 11: 29–40.
24. Taylor CS. Validity and validation. 2013.
25. Soper D. A-priori Sample Size Calculator for structural equation models. Software.
26. Koopmans L. Assessing Job Performance Using Brief Self-report Scales : The Case of the Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology Assessing Job Performance Using Brief Self-report Scales : The Case of the. J Work Organ Psychol 2015; 35: 6–28.
27. Pérez ER, Medrano L. Análisis factorial exploratorio : Bases conceptuales y metodológicas. Rev Argent Cienc Comport 2010; 2: 58–66.
28. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Cuarta Ed. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press, 2016.
29. Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2015.
30. Li CH. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behav Res Methods 2016; 48: 936–949.
31. Schumacker RE, Lomax RG. A Beginner´s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling. 4th ed. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2016.
32. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. J Mark Res 1981; 18: 382–388.
33. Hair J, Black W, Babin B, et al. Multivariate Data Analysis. Seventh Ed. 2010.
34. Pascual-Ferrá P, Beatty MJ. Correcting Internal Consistency Estimates Inflated by Correlated Item Errors. Commun Res Reports 2015; 32: 347–352.
35. McDonald RP. Test Theory: A United Treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1999.
36. Dominguez-Lara SA. Evaluación de la confiabilidad del constructo mediante el Coeficiente H: breve revisión conceptual y aplicaciones. Psychol Av la Discip 2016; 10: 87–94.
37. Raykov T, Hancock GR. Examining change in maximal reliability for multiple-component measuring instruments. Br J Math Stat Psychol 2005; 58: 65–82.
38. Byrne BM. Testing for multigroup equivalence of a measuring instrument: a walk through the process. Psicothema 2008; 20: 872–82.
39. Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance. Struct Equ Model A Multidiscip J 2009; 9: 233–255.
40. Gabini S, Salessi S. Validation of the job performance scale in argentinean workers. Rev Evaluar 2016; 16: 10–26.
41. Ramos-Villagrasa PJ, Barrada JR, Fernández-Del-Río E, et al. Assessing job performance using brief self-report scales: The case of the individual work performance questionnaire. Rev Psicol del Trab y las Organ; 35. Epub ahead of print 2019. DOI: 10.5093/jwop2019a21.
42. Geraldo Campos LA. Validación de la escala desempeño laboral individual en colaboradores peruanos. Rev Investig en Psicol; 25. Epub ahead of print 2022. DOI: 10.15381/rinvp.v25i1.21920.
43. Zinbarg RE, Revelle W, Yovel I, et al. Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and Mcdonald’s ω H : their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychom 2005 701 2005; 70: 123–133.
44. Dominguez-Lara SA, Merino-Soto C. Fiabilidad por consistencia interna de medidas de un solo ítem. Actas Urologicas Espanolas; 41. Epub ahead of print 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2016.04.003.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Irma Chalco-Ccapa, Gaby Torres-Mamani , Mardel Morales-García , Alcides A Flores-Saenz, Liset Z. Sairitupa-Sanchez , Maribel Paredes-Saavedra, Wilter C. Morales-García (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
