Fuzzy Decision-Making Model for the inventory leveling under uncertainty conditionModelo de toma de decisiones difusa para la nivelación del inventario en condiciones de incertidumbre
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2024142Keywords:
Supply Chain Uncertainty, Inventory Management, Decision-making, Bullwhips Effects, Fuzzy Logic, SimulationAbstract
The Option to create inventory is not always the optimal choice, due to the associated expenses and space requirements. Nevertheless, there are instances where a shortage of materials on customer lines can result in substantial financial penalties. This constant contradiction places supply chain managers in a perplexing predicament, especially when considering the amplification of inventory through the bullwhip effect as it moves across different stages. Moreover, the uncertain backdrop created by unforeseen events intensifies this already critical situation, compelling managers to seek new decision-making approaches. These approaches should enable the simulation of risks and the selection of suitable scenarios, particularly within the intricate domain of stochastic and dynamically evolving supply chains. The purpose of this study is to provide a new decision-making model rooted in the fuzzy logic concept introduced by Loutfi Zadeh in 1965. This model is applied to criteria assessed by experts, representing the most pertinent parameters for guiding inventory optimization. The chosen criteria encompass Lead Time, Equipment Production Reliability, and Warehousing Costs. This model exhibits the potential to unearth intricate patterns and associations among variables that conventional statistical methods struggle to reveal. Notably, the integration of fuzzy logic for inventory prediction yields promising outcomes, extendable to the realm of artificial intelligence, where comprehensive inference rules facilitate effective decision-making
References
1. Bufferne J. Le guide de la TPM, total productive maintenance. Éditions d’Organisation; 2006.
2. Tabit S, Aziz S. INDUSTIAL PERFORMANCE CONTROL WITH FUZZY LOGIC AND AHP METHODS. 2022;3(13).
3. Hatim L, Aziz S. SUPPLY CHAIN RISK ASSESSMENT WITH FUZZY LOGIC APPLIED TO THE FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS METHOD. 2023;(10).
4. Romero-Carazas R. Prompt lawyer: a challenge in the face of the integration of artificial intelligence and law. Gamification and Augmented Reality 2023;1:7–7. https://doi.org/10.56294/gr20237.
5. Ayhan MB. A Fuzzy Ahp Approach For Supplier Selection Problem: A Case Study In A Gearmotor Company. International Journal of Managing Value and Supply Chains. 2013;4(3):11–23. https://doi.org/10.5121/ijmvsc.2013.4302.
6. Zaeri MS, et al. Application of multi criteria decision making technique to evaluation suppliers in supply chain management.
7. Pimor Y, Fender M. Logistique : production, distribution, soutien. 5e éd. L’Usine nouvelle : Dunod; 2008.
8. Hnaien F. Gestion des stocks dans des chaînes logistiques face aux aléas des délais d’approvisionnements.
9. Kim CO, et al. Adaptive inventory control models for supply chain management. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2005;26(9–10):1184–1192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2069-8.
10. Gonzalez-Argote J. A Bibliometric Analysis of the Studies in Modeling and Simulation: Insights from Scopus. Gamification and Augmented Reality 2023;1:5–5. https://doi.org/10.56294/gr20235.
11. Glushchenko AS, Rodin VA, Sinegubov SV. Visualization of logistic algorithm in Wilson model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2018;1015:032133. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1015/3/032133.
12. Więcek P. Intelligent Approach to Inventory Control in Logistics under Uncertainty Conditions. Transportation Research Procedia. 2016;18:164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.12.023.
13. Tabit S, et al. ROAD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT WITH FUZZY LOGIC APPROACH.
14. Zadeh LA. Fuzzy set as a basis for theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets Systems. 1976;1(2):3-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(78)90029-5.
15. Garcia CA, et al. Inventory control for the supply chain: An adaptive control approach based on the identification of the lead-time. Omega. 2012;40(3):314–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2011.07.003.
16. Fuzzy logic expert system for supply chain resilience modelling.
17. Dwi Putra MS, et al. Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process Method to Determine the Quality of Gemstones. Advances in Fuzzy Systems. 2018:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9094380.
18. Ganguly K, Kumar G. Supply Chain Risk Assessment: a fuzzy AHP approach. Operations and Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. 2019:1–13. https://doi.org/10.31387/oscm0360217.
19. Jeddou MB. Application de la méthode AHP pour le choix multicritères des fournisseurs.
20. Gonzalez-Argote D, Gonzalez-Argote J, Machuca-Contreras F. Blockchain in the health sector: a systematic literature review of success cases. Gamification and Augmented Reality 2023;1:6–6. https://doi.org/10.56294/gr20236.
21. Kahraman C, ed. Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making. Springer US (Springer Optimization and Its Applications); 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-76813-7.
22. Kozarević S, Puška A. Use of fuzzy logic for measuring practices and performances of supply chain. Operations Research Perspectives. 2018;5:150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2018.07.001.
23. Lee S. Application of AHP and Fuzzy AHP to Decision-Making Problems in Construction.
24. Mahad NF, Yusof Nm, Ismail NF. The application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to solve multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019;1358(1):012081. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1358/1/012081.
25. Mahmud S, et al. A Comparative Study of AHP and Fuzzy AHP Method for Inconsistent Data. International Journal of Sciences. 2020;54(4).
26. Ohayon K, Ounnar F, Pujo P. Amélioration de l’ordonnancement d’une ligne de production par la méthode AHP.
27. Gonzalez-Argote J. Analyzing the Trends and Impact of Health Policy Research: A Bibliometric Study. Health Leadership and Quality of Life 2023;2:28-28. https://doi.org/10.56294/hl202328.
28. Omar AS, Waweru M, Rimiru DR. A Literature Survey: Fuzzy Logic and Qualitative Performance Evaluation of Supply Chain Management.
29. Peng G, et al. An Application of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process in Risk Evaluation Model. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021;12:715003. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715003.
30. Pokorádi L. Fuzzy logic-based risk assessment. Fuzzy logic. 2002;11.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Hatim Lakhouil, Aziz Soulhi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
