Investigating the attitude of university students towards the use of ChatGPT as a learning resource

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2024268

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, ChatGPT, University students, Attitude, Chatbot

Abstract

Introduction: currently, the integration of innovative technologies plays a crucial role in students' academic formation. In this context, ChatGPT emerges as a cutting-edge tool with the potential to transform the educational experience.
Objective: to assess the attitude of university students towards the use of ChatGPT as a learning resource.
Methods: a quantitative study, non-experimental design and observational and descriptive type. The sample was determined through simple random sampling and consisted of 269 university students of both genders who were administered the Attitudes towards the Use of ChatGPT Scale, an instrument with adequate metric properties.
Results: the attitude towards the use of ChatGPT as a learning resource was predominantly rated at a medium level, as were the affective, cognitive, and behavioral dimensions. This suggests that students enjoy using ChatGPT as a tool in their learning process and consider it facilitates and improves their educational experience. However, they expressed concern about the possibility of this tool generating inaccurate results.
Conclusions: the attitude of university students towards the use of ChatGPT as a learning resource was rated at a medium level. Likewise, it was determined that as students progressed in their academic training, they developed a more favorable attitude towards the use of ChatGPT

References

1. Chaudhry M, Kazim E. Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd): a high-level academic and industry note 2021. AI Ethics. 2022;2(1):157-165. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs43681-021-00074-z

2. Sarker I. AI-based modeling: Techniques, applications and research issues towards automation, intelligent and smart systems. SN Comput Sci. 2022;3(2):158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01043-x

3. Korteling J, Van de Boer G, Blankendaal R, Boonekamp R, Eikelboom A. Human-versus artificial intelligence. Front Artif Intell. 2021;4:622364. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffrai.2021.622364

4. Kamalov F, Santandreu Calonge D, Gurrib I. New era of artificial intelligence in education: Towards a sustainable multifaceted revolution. Sustainability. 2023; 15:12451. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612451

5. Sallam M. ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: Systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(6):887. https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fhealthcare11060887

6. Schleiss J, Laupichler MC, Raupach T, Stober S. AI course design planning framework: Developing domain-specific ai education courses. Educ Sci. 2023;13:954. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090954

7. Abdaljaleel M, Barakat M, Alsanafi M, Salim N, Abazid H, Malaeb D, et al. A multinational study on the factors influencing university students' attitudes and usage of ChatGPT. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):1983. https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fs41598-024-52549-8

8. Giansanti D. Precision medicine 2.0: How digital health and ai are changing the game. J Pers Med. 2023;13(7):1057. https://doi.org/10.3390%2Fjpm13071057

9. Ray P. ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. IoT Cyberphys Syst. 2023;3:121-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003

10. Nazir A, Wang Z. A comprehensive survey of ChatGPT: Advancements, applications, prospects, and challenges. Meta Radiol. 2023;1(2):100022. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.metrad.2023.100022

11. Javaid M, Haleem A, Singh R. A study on ChatGPT for Industry 4.0: Background, potentials, challenges, and eventualities. J Econ Technol. 2023;1:127-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ject.2023.08.001

12. Ibrahim H, Liu F, Asim R, Battu B, Benabderrahmane S, Alhafni B, et al. Perception, performance, and detectability of conversational artificial intelligence across 32 university courses. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):12187. https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fs41598-023-38964-3

13. Hasanein A, Sobaih A. Drivers and consequences of ChatGPT use in higher education: Key stakeholder perspectives. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023;13(11):2599-2614.

14. Labadze L, Grigolia M, Machaidze L. Role of AI chatbots in education: Systematic literature review. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2023;20:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00426-1

15. Montenegro M, Fernández J, Fernández J, López E. Impact of the implementation of ChatGPT in education: A systematic review. Computers. 2023;12:153. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12080153

16. Kasneci E, Sessler K, Küchemann S, Bannert M, Dementieva D, Fischer F, et al. ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learn. Indiv. Diff. 2023;103:102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

17. Zhang P, Tur G. A systematic review of ChatGPT use in K-12 education. Eur J Educ. 2023;00:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12599

18. Shen Y, Heacock L, Elias J, Hentel K, Reig B, Shih G, et al. ChatGPT and other large language models are double-edged swords. Radiology. 2023;307(2):e230163. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.230163

19. Kapsali M Z, Livanis E, Tsalikidis C, et al. Ethical Concerns About ChatGPT in Healthcare: A Useful Tool or the Tombstone of Original and Reflective Thinking? Cureus. 2024;16(2):e54759. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.54759

20. Kim S. Using ChatGPT for language editing in scientific articles. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;45(1):13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-023-00381-x

21. Kandeel M, Eldakak A. Legal dangers of using ChatGPT as a co-author according to academic research regulations. Journal of Governance and Regulation. 2024;13(S1):289–298. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/jgrv13i1siart3

22. García O. Uso y percepción de ChatGPT en la educación superior. RITI. 2023;11(23):98-107. https://doi.org/10.36825/RITI.11.23.009

23. Ngo T. The perception by university students of the use of ChatGPT in education. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 2023;18(17):4-19. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i17.39019

24. Ajlouni A, Abd-Alkareem F, Salem A. Students’ attitudes towards using ChatGPT as a learning tool: The case of the University of Jordan. Int J Interact Mobile Technol. 2023;17(18):99–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i18.41753

25. Hernández R, Mendoza C. Metodología de la investigación: las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. México: McGraw-Hill; 2018.

26. Gobira M, Nakayama L, Moreira R, Andrade E, Regatieri C, Belfort R. Performance of ChatGPT-4 in answering questions from the Brazilian National Examination for Medical Degree Revalidation. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2023;69(10):e20230848. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20230848

27. Auza-Santivañez JC, Lopez-Quispe AG, Carías A, Huanca BA, Remón AS, Condo-Gutierrez AR, et al. Work of the emergency system in polytraumatized patients transferred to the hospital. AG Multidisciplinar 2023;1:9-9. https://doi.org/10.62486/agmu20239.

28. Cabrera-Aguilar E, Zevallos-Francia M, Morales-García M, Ramírez-Coronel AA, Morales-García SB, Sairitupa-Sanchez LZ, et al. Resilience and stress as predictors of work engagement: the mediating role of self-efficacy in nurses. Frontiers in Psychiatry 2023;14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1202048.

29. Cayupe JC, Bernedo-Moreira DH, Morales-García WC, Alcaraz FL, Peña KBC, Saintila J, et al. Self-efficacy, organizational commitment, workload as predictors of life satisfaction in elementary school teachers: the mediating role of job satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology 2023;14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1066321.

30. Chura S, Saintila J, Mamani R, Ruiz Mamani PG, Morales-García WC. Predictors of Depression in Nurses During COVID-19 Health Emergency; the Mediating Role of Resilience: A Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Primary Care and Community Health 2022;13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319221097075.

31. Cuervo MED. Exclusive breastfeeding. Factors that influence its abandonment. AG Multidisciplinar 2023;1:6-6. https://doi.org/10.62486/agmu20236.

32. Dilas D, Flores R, Morales-García WC, Calizaya-Milla YE, Morales-García M, Sairitupa-Sanchez L, et al. Social Support, Quality of Care, and Patient Adherence to Tuberculosis Treatment in Peru: The Mediating Role of Nurse Health Education. Patient Preference and Adherence 2023;17:175-86. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S391930.

33. Figueredo-Rigores A, Blanco-Romero L, Llevat-Romero D. Systemic view of periodontal diseases. AG Odontologia 2023;1:14-14. https://doi.org/10.62486/agodonto202314.

34. Gonzalez-Argote J, Castillo-González W. Update on the use of gamified educational resources in the development of cognitive skills. AG Salud 2024;2:41-41. https://doi.org/10.62486/agsalud202441.

35. Huaman N, Morales-García WC, Castillo-Blanco R, Saintila J, Huancahuire-Vega S, Morales-García SB, et al. An Explanatory Model of Work-family Conflict and Resilience as Predictors of Job Satisfaction in Nurses: The Mediating Role of Work Engagement and Communication Skills. Journal of Primary Care and Community Health 2023;14. https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319231151380.

36. Huancahuire-Vega S, Newball-Noriega EE, Rojas-Humpire R, Saintila J, Rodriguez-Vásquez M, Ruiz-Mamani PG, et al. Changes in Eating Habits and Lifestyles in a Peruvian Population during Social Isolation for the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism 2021;2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4119620.

37. Huirse SAH, Panique JCA. Relationship Marketing and customer loyalty in the company Saga Falabella S.A. Cusco. SCT Proceedings in Interdisciplinary Insights and Innovations 2024;2:206-206. https://doi.org/10.56294/piii2024206.

38. Ledesma-Céspedes N, Leyva-Samue L, Barrios-Ledesma L. Use of radiographs in endodontic treatments in pregnant women. AG Odontologia 2023;1:3-3. https://doi.org/10.62486/agodonto20233.

39. Marquez NM, Saintila J, Castellanos-Vazquez AJ, Dávila-Villavicencio R, Turpo-Chaparro J, Sánchez-Tarrillo JA, et al. Telehealth-based interventions on lifestyle, body mass index, and glucose concentration in university staff during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A pre-experimental study. Digital Health 2022;8. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076221129719.

40. Millán YA, Montano-Silva RM, Ruiz-Salazar R. Epidemiology of oral cancer. AG Odontologia 2023;1:17-17. https://doi.org/10.62486/agodonto202317.

41. Morales-García WC, Huancahuire-Vega S, Saintila J, Morales-García M, Fernández-Molocho L, Ruiz Mamani PG. Predictors of Intention to Vaccinate Against COVID-19 in a Peruvian Sample. Journal of Primary Care and Community Health 2022;13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319221092254.

42. Olguín-Martínez CM, Rivera RIB, Perez RLR, Guzmán JRV, Romero-Carazas R, Suárez NR, et al. Rescue of the historical-cultural heritage of the Yanesha: interculturality and inclusive education of the oral traditions. AG Multidisciplinar 2023;1:5-5. https://doi.org/10.62486/agmu20235.

43. Otero DL, Licourt MT. Clinical and genetic characterization of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. SCT Proceedings in Interdisciplinary Insights and Innovations 2024;2:221-221. https://doi.org/10.56294/piii2024221.

44. Plaza-Ccuno JNR, Puri CV, Calizaya-Milla YE, Morales-García WC, Huancahuire-Vega S, Soriano-Moreno AN, et al. Physical Inactivity is Associated with Job Burnout in Health Professionals During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy 2023;16:725-33. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S393311.

45. Quiroz FJR, Gamarra NH. Psychometric evidence of the mobile dependence test in the young population of Lima in the context of the pandemic. AG Salud 2024;2:40-40. https://doi.org/10.62486/agsalud202440.

46. Ríos-Quispe CF. Analysis of ABC Cost Systems. AG Managment 2023;1:12-12. https://doi.org/10.62486/agma202312.

47. Saavedra MOR. Revaluation of Property, Plant and Equipment under the criteria of IAS 16: Property, Plant and Equipment. AG Managment 2023;1:11-11. https://doi.org/10.62486/agma202311.

48. Solano AVC, Arboleda LDC, García CCC, Dominguez CDC. Benefits of artificial intelligence in companies. AG Managment 2023;1:17-17. https://doi.org/10.62486/agma202317.

49. Soto CEH, Lizarme EAV. Administrative management and user satisfaction of tele-consultation in a FEBAN polyclinic in Lima. SCT Proceedings in Interdisciplinary Insights and Innovations 2024;2:217-217. https://doi.org/10.56294/piii2024217.

50. Trovat V, Ochoa M, Hernández-Runque E, Gómez R, Jiménez M, Correia P. Quality of work life in workers with disabilities in manufacturing and service companies. AG Salud 2024;2:43-43. https://doi.org/10.62486/agsalud202443.

51. Alawida M, Mejri S, Mehmood A, Chikhaoui B, Isaac Abiodun O. A Comprehensive Study of ChatGPT: Advancements, Limitations, and ethical considerations in natural language processing and cybersecurity. Information. 2023;14(8):462. https://doi.org/10.3390/info14080462

52. Gonzalez-Argote J, Castillo-González W. Performance of ChatGPT tool in the resolution of residency exams in Argentina. Semin Med Writ Educ. 2024;3:56. https://doi.org/10.56294/mw202456

53. Farhi F, Jeljeli R, Aburezeq I, Dweikat F, Al-shami S, Slamene R. Analyzing the students' views, concerns, and perceived ethics about ChatGPT usage. Comput. Educ.: Artif. Intell. 2023;5:100180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100180

54. Almaraz C, Almaraz F, López C. Comparative study of the attitudes and perceptions of university students in business administration and management and in education toward artificial intelligence. Educ Sci. 2023;13:609. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060609

55. Romero J, Ramírez M, Buenestado M, Lara F. Use of ChatGPT at university as a tool for complex thinking: students' perceived usefulness. J New Approaches Educ Res. 2023;12(2):323-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.7821/naer.2023.7.1458

56. Roumeliotis K, Tselikas N. ChatGPT and open-ai models: A preliminary review. Future Internet. 2023;15:192. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15060192

57. Dempere J, Modugu K, Hesham A, Ramasamy LK. The impact of ChatGPT on higher education. Front Educ. 2023;8:1206936. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1206936

58. Strzelecki A. Students’ Acceptance of ChatGPT in Higher Education: An Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Innov High Educ. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-023-09686-1

Published

2024-01-01

Issue

Section

Original

How to Cite

1.
Estrada-Araoz EG, Paredes-Valverde Y, Quispe-Herrera R, Gallegos-Ramos NA, Rivera-Mamani FA, Romaní-Claros A. Investigating the attitude of university students towards the use of ChatGPT as a learning resource. Data and Metadata [Internet]. 2024 Jan. 1 [cited 2024 Sep. 19];3:268. Available from: https://dm.ageditor.ar/index.php/dm/article/view/316