Analysis of scientific information from a bibliometric approach between Chat GPT and Scopus: A comparative study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2024252Keywords:
Dynamic Capabilities, Scientific Publications, ChatGPT, BibliometricAbstract
One of the main challenges faced by teachers, researchers, and students today is efficiently filtering reliable and useful information available on the internet, as well as in scientific academic databases. To address this phenomenon, the bibliometrics tool is used, which involves understanding the number of publications, analyzing them, and determining their trend based on the application of filters and relationships of scientific concepts in specialized topics. There are other technological tools that allow finding bibliographic information on the internet, such as artificial intelligence (AI) specifically through the ChatGPT chatbot (Generative Pre-trained transformer). The objective of this article is to identify the differences between the results of a bibliometric analysis from Scopus and ChatGPT; the research type is documentary; the search strategy for the bibliometric analysis was "Dynamic Capabilities." Findings show that there are differences between the data obtained from the two bibliometric analyses, including authors, subject areas, affiliations, and keywords; it should be noted that the use of ChatGPT is a basic and simple tool that complements the bibliometric analysis provided by an academic database like Scopus; it is suggested to compare the results analytically and manually at all times, which is of interest to academia and the development of theoretical frameworks in research work
References
1. López de Mántaras R. Progressos, reptes i riscos de la Intel·ligència Artificial. Mètode Revista de difusió de la investigació. 2018 Nov 20;(9).
2. Flores-Vivar JM, García-Peñalvo FJ. Reflections on the ethics, potential, and challenges of artificial intelligence in the framework of quality education (SDG4). Comunicar. 2023;30(74):35–44.
3. Arrieta AB, Díaz-Rodríguez N, Del Ser J, Bennetot A, Tabik S, Barbado A, et al. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AI. 2019 Oct 22; Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10045
4. Rouhiainen L. Inteligencia artificial : 101 cosas que debes saber hoy sobre nuestro futuro. Alienta; 2018.
5. Fjeld J, Achten N, Hilligoss H, Nagy AC, Srikumar M. Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-based Approaches to Principles for AI [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3518482
6. Atencio-González RE, Bonilla-Ron DE, Miles-Flores MV, López-Zavala SÁ. Chat GPT como Recurso para el Aprendizaje del Pensamiento Crítico en Estudiantes Universitarios. CIENCIAMATRIA. 2023 Jul 1;9(17):36–44.
7. Castillo-González W, Lepez CO, Bonardi MC. Chat GPT: a promising tool for academic editing. Data and Metadata. 2022 Oct 12;1.
8. Jarrahi MH. Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making. Bus Horiz. 2018 Jul 1;61(4):577–86.
9. Lopardo HÁ. La inteligencia artificial en la redacción de artículos científicos. Vol. 57.
10. Lund BD, Wang T. Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4333415
11. Lake BM, Ullman TD, Tenenbaum JB, Gershman SJ. Building machines that learn and think like people. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2017;40.
12. Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Vol. 18, Strategic Management Journal. 1997.
13. Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA. DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES: WHAT ARE THEY? Vol. 21, Strategic Management Journal Strat. Mgmt. J. 2000.
14. De la Hoz Domínguez EJ, Fontalvo Herrera TJ, Mendoza Mendoza AA. Aprendizaje automático y PYMES: Oportunidades para el mejoramiento del proceso de toma de decisiones. Investigación e Innovación en Ingenierías. 2020 Jan 1;21–36.
15. García-Peñalvo FJ. La percepción de la Inteligencia Artificial en contextos educativos tras el lanzamiento de ChatGPT: disrupción o pánico. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS). 2023 Feb 6;24:e31279.
16. Vanderlinde G, Cury TM. El uso de inteligencia artificial y sus desafíos para la evaluación académica: una revisión de la literatura. 2022; 21.
17. Morales-Chan MA. Explorando el potencial de Chat GPT: Una clasificación de Prompts efectivos para la enseñanza.
18. Mori A,. La creciente ola de Chat GPT y otrasInteligencias Artificiales. (2023)(3)-12-15.
19. García-Peñalvo FJ. La percepción de la Inteligencia Artificial en contextos educativos tras el lanzamiento de ChatGPT: disrupción o pánico. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS). 2023 Feb 6;24:e31279.
20. Agustín M, Papich R, Elizabeth S. El futuro de la Educación Universitaria con Chat GPT.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ana Karen Romero, Deyanira Bernal, Reyna Christian Sánchez (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
