The impact of entrepreneurship support programs on the survival of young agricultural enterprises: A Cox model approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2025342Keywords:
Support for agricultural entrepreneurship, Young agricultural entrepreneur, Technical support model for young agricultural entrepreneurs, Survival of small agricultural enterprise, Duration modelAbstract
This study examines the factors influencing the survival of new agricultural enterprises created by young entrepreneurs, using a sample of 184 businesses over a three-year period after their creation. The analysis begins with a description of the sample’s characteristics and then employs two quantitative approaches: the non-parametric Kaplan-Meier method and the semi-parametric Cox model. Empirical results reveal several key elements that significantly impact business survival. Entrepreneurial training is crucial as it enhances the skills needed to address challenges. Prior experience in the agricultural sector also strengthens entrepreneurs' resilience. Sufficient startup capital is essential for supporting initial operations and handling unforeseen issues. Innovation plays a vital role by enabling businesses to differentiate themselves and adapt to market changes. Finally, activity diversification helps mitigate risks and stabilize income. The study highlights the need for more diverse and adaptive post-creation support to effectively assist these businesses in their long-term development. Better-targeted and tailored support for young entrepreneurs could significantly improve survival rates and foster the sustainable growth of new agricultural enterprises
References
(1) Bosma, N., Van Praag, M., Thurik, R., & De Wit, G. (2004). The value of human and social capital investments for the business performance of startups. Small Business Economics, 23 (3), 227-236.
(2) Brüderl, J., & Preisendörfer, P. (1998). Network support and the success of newly founded business. Small business economics, 10 (3), 213-225
(3) Robb, AM and Watson. J. (2012). Gender differences in business performance: evidence from US start-ups. Journal of Business Venturing, 27 (5), 544-558.
(4) Bates, T. (1990). Entrepreneurial human capital inputs and small business longevity. The Journal of Economics and Statistics, 551-559.
(5) Randelli, F., & Ricchiuti, G. (2015). The survival of Tuscan firms (No. wp2015_02. rdf). Universita degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
(6) Lamontagne, E.. & Thirion, B. (2000). Business creation, survival factors: the qualities of the project take precedence over those of the creator.
(7) Crépon, B., & Duguet, E. (2003). Bank loans, start-up subsidies and the survival of the new firms: an econometric analysis at the entrepreneur level. Start-up Subsidies and the Survival of the New Firms: An Econometric Analysis at the Entrepreneur Level.
(8) Cressy R. (1996). Are business startups debt-rationed? Economic Journal, n° 106, pp. 1253-1270.
(9) Battistin, E., Gavosto, A., & Rettore, E. (2001). Why do subsidised firms survive longer? An evaluation of a program promoting youth entrepreneurship in Italy. In Econometric evaluation of labor market policies (pp. 153-181). Physica, Heidelberg.
(10) Neffke F., Henning M. and Boschma R. (2012). The impact of aging and technological relatedness on agglomeration externalities: a survival analysis, Journal of Economic Geography. vol. 12 p. 485-517
(11) Randelli, F., & Ricchiuti, G. (2015). The survival of Tuscan firms (No. wp2015_02. rdf). Universita degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
(12) McElwee, G., & Atherton, A. (2021). Rural entrepreneurship. In World encyclopedia of entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing.
(13) McElwee, JJ, Schuster, E., Blanc, E., Thomas, JH and Gems, D. (2004). Shared transcriptional signature in Caenorhabditis elegans Dauer larvae and long-lived daf-2 mutants implicates detoxification system in longevity assurance. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 279 (43), 44533-44543.
(14) Carter, S. (1998). Portfolio entrepreneurship in the agricultural sector: indigenous growth in rural areas? Entrepreneurship & regional development, 10 (1), 17-32.
(15) Cooper, A. C., Gimeno-Gascon, F. J., & Woo, C. Y. (1994). Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. Journal of business venturing, 9(5), 371-395.
(16) O'Neill, H. M., & Duker, J. (1986). Survival and failure in small business. Journal of Small Business Management, 24(1), 30-37.
(17) Hansen, EL (1995). Entrepreneurial networks and the growth of new organizations. Entrepreneurial Theory and Practice, 19 (4), 7-19.
(18) Davidson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital in nascent entrepreneurs. Journal de l'entreprise, 18 (3), 301-331.
(19) Lavoisier I.V. (2011). Heurs et malheurs des chômeurs créateurs d'entreprises. Terrains et Travaux, vol. 2, n°19, p. 121-139.
(20) Cressy, R., Cumming, D. and Mallin, C. (2012). Entrepreneurship, governance and ethics. In Entrepreneurship, Governance and Ethics (pp. 117-120). Springer, Dordrecht
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Siham Ammari , Amina Guennoun , Ouafae Ammari, Mohamed Jallal El Adnani, Souad Habbani (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.