Individual and Technological Factors Affecting the Adoption of AI-Powered Remote Auditing in the Jordanian Banking Sector
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2024.408Keywords:
AI-Powered remote auditing, Technology readiness, Data security and privacy, Integration capabilities, Auditor skill level, Attitude towards technologyAbstract
Introduction
Artificial intelligence technologies have recently contributed to the field of remote auditing and have led to significant improvements in the efficiency and outcomes of the audit process. However, this professional technological integration remains unexplored in the Jordanian banking sector. Accordingly, understanding the mechanism of integration between these factors is essential to keep pace with the evolving work environment. This study aims to examine how these factors affect the adoption of remote auditing supported by artificial intelligence in Jordanian banks.
Methods
A quantitative approach consistent with a cross-sectional design was used to collect primary research data. A structured questionnaire was distributed to 158 decision-makers in various commercial banks in Jordan. The questionnaire measured individual factors (e.g., skill level of users and Attitude towards technology) and technological factors (e.g., technology readiness, data security and privacy, and integration capabilities). Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to test the relationships between these factors and intention to adopt AI-powered remote auditing using SMART PLS.
Results
The results depicted that all factors, including individual and technological factors, significantly influenced the adoption of AI-powered remote auditing. Attitude towards technology and integration capabilities were the strongest predictors. Additionally, technology readiness, data security and privacy, and skill level of users had moderate but significant, effects on adoption intention.
Conclusion
The findings emphasize that both individual perceptions and technological robustness are crucial for adopting AI-powered remote auditing in Jordanian banks. Improving system reliability and showcasing the benefits of AI tools can significantly boost adoption rates
References
1. Jaradat Z, Al-Ibbini OA, Shbail MOA, Jamil AA. Towards sustainability in SMEs post recovery from COVID-19 crisis: the influence of intellectual capital and cost strategy. Int J Product Qual Manag. 2023;39(1):97-119.
2. Lamboglia R, Lavorato D, Scornavacca E, Za S. Exploring the relationship between audit and technology. A bibliometric analysis. Meditari Account Res. 2021;29(5):1233-60.
3. Eulerich M, Pawlowski J, Waddoups NJ, Wood DA. A framework for using robotic process automation for audit tasks. Contemp Account Res. 2022;39(1):691-720.
4. Farcane N, Bunget OC, Blidisel R, Dumitrescu AC, Deliu D, Bogdan O, et al. Auditors’ perceptions on work adaptability in remote audit: a COVID-19 perspective. Econ Res-Ekonomska Istraživanja. 2023;36(1):422-59.
5. Castka P, Zhao X, Bremer P, Wood LC, Mirosa M. Supplier audits during COVID-19: a process perspective on their transformation and implications for the future. Int J Logist Manag. 2022;33(4):1294-314.
6. Alshurafat H, Al-Mawali H, Al Shbail MO. The influence of technostress on the intention to use blockchain technology: the perspectives of Jordanian auditors. Dev Learn Org. 2023;37(3):24-7.
7. Zhang Y, Xiong F, Xie Y, Fan X, Gu H. The impact of artificial intelligence and blockchain on the accounting profession. IEEE Access. 2020;8:110461-77.
8. Abdennadher S, Grassa R, Abdulla H, Alfalasi A. The effects of blockchain technology on the accounting and assurance profession in the UAE: an exploratory study. J Financ Rep Account. 2022;20(1):53-71.
9. Huang F, Vasarhelyi M. Applying robotic process automation (RPA) in auditing: a framework. Int J Account Inf Syst. 2019;35:100433.
10. Alshurafat H, Al Shbail M, Almuiet M. Factors affecting the intention to adopt IT forensic accounting tools to detect financial cybercrimes. Int J Bus Excell. 2022;10.
11. Al Shbail MO, Alshurafat H, Ananzeh H, Mansour E, Hamdan A. Factors affecting the adoption of remote auditing during the times of COVID-19: An integrated perspective of diffusion of innovations model and the technology acceptance model. Paper presented at the International Conference on Business and Technology; 2022.
12. Al-Mawali H, Obeidat ZM, Alshurafat H, Al Shbail MO. Identifying and ranking the critical success factors of fintech adoption: a fuzzy DEMATEL approach. Compet Rev Int Bus J. 2023.
13. Baker M, Yusof Z. The effects of social capital and individual factors on knowledge sharing among ERP system users. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inf Technol. 2016;6(6):812-9.
14. Al Shbail M, Jaradat Z, Baker M, Almuiet M. Individual and technological factors affecting the adoption of enterprise resource planning systems in the Jordanian banking sector. Int J Bus Inf Syst. 2024;45(1):118-41.
15. Al Shbail MO, Bani-Khalid TO, Ananzeh H, Al-Hazaima H, Al Shbail A. Technostress impact on the intention to adopt blockchain technology in auditing companies. J Gov Reg. 2023;12(3).
16. Khatatbeh IN, Alshurafat H, Al Shbail MO, Jamaani F. Factors affecting employees use and acceptance of remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from the Jordanian insurance sector. SAGE Open. 2023;13(2).
17. Jaradat Z, Al-Dmour A, Alshurafat H, Al-Hazaima H, Al Shbail MO. Factors influencing business intelligence adoption: evidence from Jordan. J Decis Syst. 2022;1-21.
18. Bell J, Waters S. Doing your research project: a guide for first-time researchers. McGraw-Hill Education (UK); 2018.
19. Aburumman OJ, Omar K, Al Shbail M, Aldoghan M. How to deal with the results of PLS-SEM? Paper presented at the International Conference on Business and Technology; 2022.
20. Kock N. Common method bias in PLS-SEM: a full collinearity assessment approach. Int J e-Collab. 2015;11(4):1-10.
21. Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage; 2021.
22. Odat QA, Alshurafat H, Al Shbail MO, Ananzeh H, Al Amosh H. Factors affecting accountants’ adoption of remote working: evidence from Jordanian governmental organizations. Sustainability. 2023;15(17):13224.
23. Jaradat Z, Al-Hawamleh A, Al Shbail MO, Hamdan A. Does the adoption of blockchain technology add intangible benefits to the industrial sector? Evidence from Jordan. J Financ Rep Account. 2023.
24. Hair JF, Howard MC, Nitzl C. Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. J Bus Res. 2020;109:101-10.
25. Hair JF, Risher JJ, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. Eur Bus Rev. 2019;31(1):2-24.
26. Shbail M. The associations of internal audit quality with job burnout and job satisfaction based on theory of reasoned action. Int J Acad Res Account Finance Manag Sci. 2018;8(2):208-17.
27. Shbail M. The effect of role ambiguity and role conflict on dysfunctional audit behaviour: Evidence from Jordan. Int J Acad Res Account Finance Manag Sci. 2018;8(3):17-25.
28. Jaradat Z, Shbail MA, Baker MB. Environmental and organisational factors affecting the adoption of enterprise resource planning systems in the Jordanian banking sector. Int J Bus Inf Syst. 2022;41(1):82-107.
29. Becker JM, Cheah JH, Gholamzade R, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM’s most wanted guidance. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. 2023;35(1):321-46.
30. Al Shbail MO, Alshurafat H, Ananzeh H, Bani-Khalid T. The moderating effect of job satisfaction on the relationship between human capital dimensions and internal audit effectiveness. Cogent Bus Manag. 2022;9(1):2115731.
31. Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Hair JF. Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In: Handbook of market research. Springer; 2021. p. 587-632.
32. Henseler J, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. 2015;43:115-35.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Salah Turki Alrawashdeh , Khaleel Ibrahim Al Daoud , Badrea Al Oraini , Suleiman Ibrahim Mohammad , Asokan Vasudevan , Lian Xiao , Rakan Alshbiel (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
