Conceptualizing Digital Literacy for the AI Era: A Framework for Preparing Students in an AI-Driven World
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2025530Keywords:
Artificial intelligence, Conceptual framework, Digital literacy, Education theory, Ethical considerationsAbstract
Introduction: As artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly integrated into daily life, traditional digital literacy frameworks must be revised to address the modern challenges. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive framework that redefines digital literacy in the AI era by focusing on the essential competencies and pedagogical approaches needed in AI-driven education.
Methods: This study employed a constructivist and connectivist theoretical approach combined with Jabareen's methodology for a conceptual framework analysis. A systematic literature review from 2010-2024 was conducted across education, computer science, psychology, and ethics domains, using major databases including ERIC, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar. The analysis incorporated a modified Delphi technique to validate the framework’s components.
Results: The developed framework comprises four key components: technical understanding of AI systems, practical implementation skills, critical evaluation abilities, and ethical considerations. These components are integrated with traditional digital literacy standards through a meta-learning layer that emphasises adaptability and continuous learning. This framework provides specific guidance for curriculum design, pedagogical approaches, assessment strategies, and teacher development.
Conclusions: This framework offers a structured approach for reconceptualising digital literacy in the AI era, providing educational institutions with practical guidelines for implementation. Integrating technical and humanistic aspects creates a comprehensive foundation for preparing students for an AI-driven world, while identifying areas for future empirical validation.
References
1. Halagatti M, Gadag S, Mahantshetti S, Hiremath CV, Tharkude D, Banakar V. Artificial intelligence: the new disruption tool in educational performance assessment [Internet]. In: Smart Analytics, Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Performance Management in a Global Digitalised Economy. Emerald Publishing Limited; 2023 [cited 2024 Nov 10]. page 261–87.Available from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/S1569-37592023000110A014/full/html
2. Hutson J, Jeevanjee T, Vander Graaf V, Lively J, Weber J, Weir G, et al. Artificial intelligence and the disruption of higher education: strategies for integrations across disciplines. Creative Education [Internet] 2022 [cited 2024 Aug 21];13(12). Available from: https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/faculty-research-papers/442/
3. Makridakis S. The forthcoming Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolution: Its impact on society and firms. Futures 2017;90:46–60.
4. Wong WKO. The sudden disruptive rise of generative artificial intelligence? An evaluation of their impact on higher education and the global workplace. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 2024;10(2):100278.
5. Frank MR, Autor D, Bessen JE, Brynjolfsson E, Cebrian M, Deming DJ, et al. Toward understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on labor. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2019;116(14):6531–9.
6. Schwab K, Zahidi S. World Economic Forum.(2020). The Global Competitiveness Report–How countries are performing on the road to recovery 2020;
7. Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A. The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. WW Norton & Company; 2014.
8. Aoun Joseph E. Robot-proof: Higher Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. 2017;
9. Buckingham D. Defining digital literacy-What do young people need to know about digital media? Nordic journal of digital literacy 2015;10(Jubileumsnummer):21–35.
10. Sperling K, Stenberg CJ, McGrath C, Åkerfeldt A, Heintz F, Stenliden L. In search of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in Teacher Education: A scoping review. Computers and Education Open 2024;100169.
11. Gilster P. Digital literacy [Internet]. 1997 [cited 2024 Aug 21];Available from: https://www.academia.edu/download/8413655/diglit.pdf
12. Eshet Y. Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of educational multimedia and hypermedia 2004;13(1):93–106.
13. Pangrazio L. Reconceptualising critical digital literacy. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education 2016;37(2):163–74.
14. Floridi L. AI as Agency without Intelligence: On ChatGPT, large language models, and other generative models. Philosophy and Technology 2023;
15. Robinson L, Schulz J, Blank G, Ragnedda M, Ono H, Hogan B, et al. Digital inequalities 2.0: Legacy inequalities in the information age. First Monday [Internet] 2020 [cited 2024 Aug 21];25(7). Available from: https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:ac36d8d5-cd59-4871-ab30-7925b6714243
16. Holmes W, Bialik M, Fadel C. Artificial intelligence in education promises and implications for teaching and learning [Internet]. Center for Curriculum Redesign; 2019 [cited 2024 Aug 21]. Available from: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10139722/
17. Carretero S, Vuorikari R, Punie Y. DigComp 2.1: The digital competence framework for citizens. 2017 [cited 2024 Aug 21];Available from: http://svwo.be/sites/default/files/DigComp%202.1.pdf
18. Long D, Magerko B. What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations [Internet]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2020 [cited 2024 Aug 21]. page 1–16.Available from: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3313831.3376727
19. Touretzky D, Gardner-McCune C, Martin F, Seehorn D. Envisioning AI for K-12: What should every child know about AI? [Internet]. In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. 2019 [cited 2024 Aug 21]. page 9795–9.Available from: https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/5053
20. Wing JM. Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM 2006;49(3):33–5.
21. Vygotsky LS. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard UP [Internet] 1978 [cited 2024 Aug 21];Available from: https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=RxjjUefze_oC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Vygotsky,+L.+S.,+%26+Cole,+M.+(1978).+Mind+in+society:+Development+of+higher+psy-chological+processes.+Harvard+university+press.&ots=okxYR5o2dv&sig=tskBaqnY5jhQ1zEqBdkOCxdPfBE
22. Siemens G. Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. Online] retrieved from: http://www idtl org/Journal/Jam _05/article01 html 2005;
23. Mishra P, Koehler MJ. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers college record 2006;108(6):1017–54.
24. Lin TB, Li JY, Deng F, Lee L. Understanding new media literacy: An explorative theoretical framework. Journal of educational technology & society 2013;16(4):160–70.
25. Facer K. Learning futures: Education, technology and social change. Routledge; 2011.
26. Floridi L, Cowls J. A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Machine learning and the city: Applications in architecture and urban design 2022;535–45.
27. Jabareen Y. Building a conceptual framework: philosophy, definitions, and procedure. International journal of qualitative methods 2009;8(4):49–62.
28. Okoli C, Pawlowski SD. The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & management 2004;42(1):15–29.
29. Ng DTK, Leung JKL, Chu KWS, Qiao MS. AI literacy: Definition, teaching, evaluation and ethical issues. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology 2021;58(1):504–9.
30. Shiri A. Artificial intelligence literacy: a proposed faceted taxonomy. Digital Library Perspectives [Internet] 2024 [cited 2024 Aug 21];Available from: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/DLP-04-2024-0067/full/html
31. Russell SJ, Norvig P. Artificial intelligence: a modern approach [Internet]. Pearson; 2016 [cited 2024 Aug 21]. Available from: https://thuvienso.hoasen.edu.vn/handle/123456789/8967
32. Chiu TK, Ahmad Z, Ismailov M, Sanusi IT. What are artificial intelligence literacy and competency? A comprehensive framework to support them. Computers and Education Open 2024;6:100171.
33. Hollands F, Breazeal C. Establishing AI Literacy before Adopting AI. The Science Teacher 2024;91(2):35–42.
34. Kong SC, Cheung MYW, Tsang O. Developing an artificial intelligence literacy framework: Evaluation of a literacy course for senior secondary students using a project-based learning approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence 2024;6:100214.
35. Stolpe K, Hallström J. Artificial intelligence literacy for technology education. Computers and Education Open 2024;6:100159.
36. Kandlhofer M, Steinbauer G, Hirschmugl-Gaisch S, Huber P. Artificial intelligence and computer science in education: From kindergarten to university [Internet]. In: 2016 IEEE frontiers in education conference (FIE). IEEE; 2016 [cited 2024 Aug 21]. page 1–9.Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7757570/
37. Walter Y. Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom: the relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 2024;21(1):15.
38. Tiernan P, Costello E, Donlon E, Parysz M, Scriney M. Information and Media Literacy in the Age of AI: Options for the Future. Education Sciences 2023;13(9):906.
39. Dignum V. Responsible artificial intelligence: how to develop and use AI in a responsible way [Internet]. Springer; 2019 [cited 2024 Aug 21]. Available from: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-30371-6?trk=public_post_comment-text
40. Fuller MT. ISTE standards for students, digital learners, and online Learning [Internet]. In: Research Anthology on Remote Teaching and Learning and the Future of Online Education. IGI Global; 2023 [cited 2024 Nov 10]. page 904–10.Available from: https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/iste-standards-for-students-digital-learners-and-online-learning/312762
41. Choi M. A concept analysis of digital citizenship for democratic citizenship education in the internet age. Theory & research in social education 2016;44(4):565–607.
42. Hoskins B, Fredriksson U. Learning to learn: What is it and can it be measured? [Internet]. European Commission JRC; 2008 [cited 2024 Aug 21]. Available from: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:128429
43. Zimmerman BJ. Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into practice 2002;41(2):64–70.
44. Knowles MS. Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. The Adult Ed ucation Company 1975;
45. Mezirow J. Fostering critical reflection in adulthood [Internet]. Jossey-Bass Publishers San Francisco; 1990 [cited 2024 Aug 21]. Available from: https://commons.ln.edu.hk/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?filename=0&article=1123&context=osl_conference&type=additional
46. Barak M. Are digital natives open to change? Examining flexible thinking and resistance to change. Computers & Education 2018;121:115–23.
47. Ertas A, Maxwell T, Rainey VP, Tanik MM. Transformation of higher education: The transdisciplinary approach in engineering. IEEE Transactions on Education 2003;46(2):289–95.
48. Hines A, Bishop PJ, Slaughter RA. Thinking about the future: Guidelines for strategic foresight [Internet]. Social Technologies Washington, DC; 2006 [cited 2024 Aug 21]. Available from: https://www.academia.edu/download/3241945/A_Hines_Synopsis.pdf
49. Grover S, Pea R. Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational researcher 2013;42(1):38–43.
50. Kolodner JL, Camp PJ, Crismond D, Fasse B, Gray J, Holbrook J, et al. Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting learning by design (tm) into practice. The journal of the learning sciences 2003;12(4):495–547.
51. Luckin R, Holmes W. Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. 2016;
52. Holstein K, McLaren BM, Aleven V. Co-designing a real-time classroom orchestration tool to support teacher-AI complementarity. Grantee Submission [Internet] 2019 [cited 2024 Aug 21];Available from: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED618924
53. Bennett RE. Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in education: principles, policy & practice 2011;18(1):5–25.
54. Biggs J, Tang C, Kennedy G. Teaching for quality learning at university 5e [Internet]. McGraw-hill education (UK); 2022 [cited 2024 Aug 21]. Available from: https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=pseVEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR13&dq=Biggs,+J.,+Tang,+C.,+%26+Kennedy,+G.+(2022).+Teaching+for+quality+learning+at+uni-versity+5e.+McGraw-hill+education+(UK).&ots=nHYxEKuqnd&sig=IyELCwVmeMeS1_LnKWyAZaTqw7c
55. Boud D, Falchikov N. Developing assessment for informing judgement [Internet]. In: Rethinking assessment in higher education. Routledge; 2007 [cited 2024 Aug 21]. page 191–207.Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203964309-23/developing-assessment-informing-judgement-david-boud-nancy-falchikov
56. Yadav A, Stephenson C, Hong H. Computational thinking for teacher education. Communications of the ACM 2017;60(4):55–62.
57. Reich J, Ito M, Team MS. From good intentions to real outcomes [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2024 Aug 21];Available from: https://clalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/GIROreport_v3_complete.pdf
58. West SM, Whittaker M, Crawford K. Discriminating systems. AI Now 2019;1–33.
59. Nye BD. Intelligent tutoring systems by and for the developing world: A review of trends and approaches for educational technology in a global context. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 2015;25:177–203.
60. Noble SU. Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism [Internet]. In: Algorithms of oppression. New York university press; 2018 [cited 2024 Aug 21]. Available from: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.18574/nyu/9781479833641.001.0001/html
61. Chan CKY. A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 2023;20(1):38.
62. Rohs M, Ganz M. MOOCs and the claim of education for all: A disillusion by empirical data. International review of research in open and distributed learning 2015;16(6):1–19.
63. Jobin A, Ienca M, Vayena E. The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature machine intelligence 2019;1(9):389–99.
64. Cetindamar D, Kitto K, Wu M, Zhang Y, Abedin B, Knight S. Explicating AI literacy of employees at digital workplaces. IEEE transactions on engineering management 2022;71:810–23.
65. Kotzee B. Educational justice, epistemic justice, and leveling down. Educational Theory 2013;63(4):331–50.
66. Coccoli M, Maresca P, Stanganelli L. Cognitive computing in education. Journal of E-learning and Knowledge Society [Internet] 2016 [cited 2024 Aug 21];12(2). Available from: https://www.learntechlib.org/p/173468/
67. Dreyfus SE, Dreyfus HL. A five-stage model of the mental activities involved in directed skill acquisition. (No Title) [Internet] 1980 [cited 2024 Aug 21];Available from: https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1360861291818665472
68. Murnane RJ, Willett JB. Methods matter: Improving causal inference in educational and social science research [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2010 [cited 2024 Aug 21]. Available from: https://books.google.com/books?hl=id&lr=&id=gUEbo75MoUcC&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=Murnane,+R.+J.,+%26+Willett,+J.+B.+(2010).+Methods+matter:+Improving+causal+infer-ence+in+educational+and+social+science+research.+Oxford+University+Press.&ots=qNTAf_Z9Ld&sig=0knSeuEmdGSrIQyhO_KDwuZ6OcM
69. Bray M, Crossley M, Watson K. Comparative and international research in education: Globalisation, context and difference [Internet]. Routledge; 2003 [cited 2024 Aug 21]. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780203452745/comparative-international-research-education-mark-bray-michael-crossley-keith-watson
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 FX. Risang Baskara (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
