Analysis of Colombian scientific production around Agroecology in Scopus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2024.618Keywords:
Agroecology, bibliometric analysis, Colombia, scientific production, sustainabilityAbstract
Introduction: This article presents a detailed analysis of Colombian scientific production in agroecology indexed in Scopus between 2013 and 2023. It addresses the main trends, themes and methodological approaches in the research. Methodology: Using a mixed methodology, a bibliometric analysis was carried out to identify patterns in productivity, collaboration and impact, which was complemented with a qualitative analysis of articles on the topic. Results: The results revealed a significant increase in scientific production, marked by the incorporation of participatory and interdisciplinary approaches, in which collaboration between local and international institutions played a crucial role. Furthermore, a transition was observed towards studies that integrate environmental sustainability with agroecological practice. This reflects the commitment to the resilience of production systems. However, challenges persist in the visibility and citation of Colombian research at a global level, which indicates the need to strengthen its dissemination and alignment with theoretical frameworks of international scope. This analysis provides a comprehensive understanding of the state of agroecology in Colombia and highlights its potential to guide sustainable agricultural policies
References
1. Svensson J, Waisman H, Vogt-Schilb A, Bataille C, Aubert PM, Jaramilo-Gil M, et al. A low GHG development pathway design framework for agriculture, forestry and land use. Energy Strategy Reviews. 2021;37:100683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100683
2. Matuk FA van M, Verschuuren B, Morseletto P, Krause T, Ludwig D, Cooke SJ, et al. Advancing co-production for transformative change by synthesizing guidance from case studies on the sustainable management and governance of natural resources. Environmental Science & Policy. 2023;149:103574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103574
3. Muchane MN, Sileshi GW, Gripenberg S, Jonsson M, Pumariño L, Barrios E. Agroforestry boosts soil health in the humid and sub-humid tropics: A meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2020;295:106899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.106899
4. Cervantes-Zapana M, Yagüe JL, Nicolás VLD, Ramirez A. Benefits of public procurement from family farming in Latin-AMERICAN countries: Identification and prioritization. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;277:123466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123466
5. Rasmussen LV, Bierbaum R, Oldekop JA, Agrawal A. Bridging the practitioner-researcher divide: Indicators to track environmental, economic, and sociocultural sustainability of agricultural commodity production. Global Environmental Change. 2017;42:33-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.001
6. Mrabet R. Chapter 2 - Sustainable agriculture for food and nutritional security. En: Farooq M, Gogoi N, Pisante M, editores. Sustainable Agriculture and the Environment. Academic Press. 2023:25-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90500-8.00013-0
7. Machebe NS, Ikeh NE, Uzochukwu IE, Baiyeri PK. Chapter 13 - Livestock—crop interaction for sustainability of agriculture and environment. En: Farooq M, Gogoi N, Pisante M, editores. Sustainable Agriculture and the Environment. Academic Press. 2023:339-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90500-8.00011-7
8. Bentsen NS, Jørgensen JR, Stupak I, Jørgensen U, Taghizadeh-Toosi A. Dynamic sustainability assessment of heat and electricity production based on agricultural crop residues in Denmark. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;213:491-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.194
9. Kearney SP, Fonte SJ, García E, Siles P, Chan KMA, Smukler SM. Evaluating ecosystem service trade-offs and synergies from slash-and-mulch agroforestry systems in El Salvador. Ecological Indicators. 2019;105:264-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.08.032
10. Dumont B, González-García E, Thomas M, Fortun-Lamothe L, Ducrot C, Dourmad JY, et al. Forty research issues for the redesign of animal production systems in the 21st century. Animal. 2014;8(8):1382-93. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114001281
11. Poster presentations. Advances in Animal Biosciences. 2013;4(2):457-556. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2040470013000113
12. Dumont B, Groot JCJ, Tichit M. Review: Make ruminants green again – how can sustainable intensification and agroecology converge for a better future? Animal. 2018;12:s210-9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731118001350
13. Campanhola C, Pandey S, editores. Subject Index. En: Sustainable Food and Agriculture. Academic Press. 2019:569-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812134-4.00057-1
14. Vanlauwe B, Hungria M, Kanampiu F, Giller KE. The role of legumes in the sustainable intensification of African smallholder agriculture: Lessons learnt and challenges for the future. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. 2019;284:106583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.106583
15. Mardero S, Schmook B, Calmé S, White RM, Chang JCJ, Casanova G, et al. Traditional knowledge for climate change adaptation in Mesoamerica: A systematic review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. 2023;7(1):100473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100473
16. Menefee D, Scott RL, Abraha M, Alfieri JG, Baker J, Browning DM, et al. Unraveling the effects of management and climate on carbon fluxes of U.S. croplands using the USDA Long-Term Agroecosystem (LTAR) network. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. 2022;326:109154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.109154
17. Béné C, Oosterveer P, Lamotte L, Brouwer ID, Haan S de, Prager SD, et al. When food systems meet sustainability – Current narratives and implications for actions. World Development. 2019;113:116-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.08.011
18. Turbay S, Nates B, Jaramillo F, Vélez JJ, Ocampo OL. Adaptación a la variabilidad climática entre los caficultores de las cuencas de los ríos Porce y Chinchiná, Colombia. Investigaciones Geográficas, Boletín del Instituto de Geografía. 2014;2014(85):95-112. https://doi.org/10.14350/rig.42298
19. Peña-Torres JA, Reina-Rozo JD. Agroecology and communal innovation: LabCampesino, a pedagogical experience from the rural youth in Sumapaz Colombia. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability. 2022;4:100162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2022.100162
20. Féliz M, Melón DE. Beyond the green new deal? Dependency, racial capitalism and struggles for a radical ecological transition in Argentina and Latin America. Geoforum. 2023;145:103653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2022.10.010
21. Aizen MA, Arbetman MP, Chacoff NP, Chalcoff VR, Feinsinger P, Garibaldi LA, et al. Chapter Two - Invasive bees and their impact on agriculture. En: Bohan DA, Vanbergen AJ, editores. The Future of Agricultural Landscapes, Part I. Academic Press. Advances in Ecological Research. 2020; 63:49-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aecr.2020.08.001
22. Abd-Elsalam KA, Afreen S, Ahmad IZ, Akanbi-Gada MA, Andrade CJ de, Andrade LM de, et al. Contributors. En: Abd-Elsalam KA, editor. Copper Nanostructures: Next-Generation of Agrochemicals for Sustainable Agroecosystems. Nanobiotechnology for Plant Protection. 2022:21-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823833-2.09990-6
23. Breeze TD, Gallai N, Garibaldi LA, Li XS. Economic Measures of Pollination Services: Shortcomings and Future Directions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2016;31(12):927-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.002
24. Krainer A, Aguirre D, Guerra M, Meiser A. Educación superior intercultural y diálogo de saberes: el caso de la Amawtay Wasi en Ecuador. Revista de la Educación Superior. 2017;46(184):55-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resu.2017.11.002
25. Rivera APT, Cuadros MO, Claros BP, Ayola SCP, Romero DCM. Efectividad de Beauveria bassiana (Baubassil®) sobre la garrapata común del ganado bovino Rhipicephalus microplus en el Departamento de la Guajira, Colombia. Revista Argentina de Microbiología. 2018;50(4):426-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ram.2017.10.005
26. Tittonell P, Fernandez M, Mujtar VEE, Preiss PV, Sarapura S, Laborda L, et al. Emerging responses to the COVID-19 crisis from family farming and the agroecology movement in Latin America – A rediscovery of food, farmers and collective action. Agricultural Systems. 2021;190:103098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103098
27. Garfí M, Martí-Herrero J, Garwood A, Ferrer I. Household anaerobic digesters for biogas production in Latin America: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016;60:599-614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.071
28. Carvalho IS de, Alvarado ST, Silva TSF, Cordeiro CL de O, Fidelis A, Saraiva RVC, et al. How does the fire regime change after creating a protected area in the Brazilian Cerrado? Journal for Nature Conservation. 2023;71:126318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2022.126318
29. Avellaneda-Torres LM, Sicard TEL, Rojas ET. Impact of potato cultivation and cattle farming on physicochemical parameters and enzymatic activities of Neotropical high Andean Páramo ecosystem soils. Science of The Total Environment. 2018;631-632:1600-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.137
30. Estupiñan-Mojica A, Portela-Salomão R, Liberal CN, Santos BA, Machado CCC, Araujo HFP de, et al. Landscape attributes shape dung beetle diversity at multiple spatial scales in agricultural drylands. Basic and Applied Ecology. 2022;63:139-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2022.06.002
31. Morón MÁ, Rojas-Gómez CV, Arce-Pérez R. Los estados inmaduros de Phyllophaga heteronycha, P. leonina y P. angulicollis (Coleoptera: Melolonthidae: Melolonthinae). Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad. 2016;87(3):933-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmb.2016.07.014
32. González-Valdivia NA, González-Escolástico G, Barba E, Hernández-Daumás S, Ochoa-Gaona S. Mirmecofauna asociada con sistemas agroforestales en el Corredor Biológico Mesoamericano en Tabasco, México. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad. 2013;84(1):306-17. https://doi.org/10.7550/rmb.30996
33. Nzeyimana I, Hartemink AE, Ritsema C, Stroosnijder L, Lwanga EH, Geissen V. Mulching as a strategy to improve soil properties and reduce soil erodibility in coffee farming systems of Rwanda. CATENA. 2017;149:43-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.08.034
34. Vasen F, Vilchis IL. Sistemas nacionales de clasificación de revistas científicas en América Latina: tendencias recientes e implicaciones para la evaluación académica en ciencias sociales. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales. 2017;62(231):199-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0185-1918(17)30043-0
35. Robles W. The politics of agricultural cooperativism in Brazil: A case study of the landless rural worker movement (MST). Journal of Co-operative Organization and Management. 2019;7(1):10-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcom.2019.02.001
36. Salas-Picazo RI, Ramírez-Bravo OE, Meza-Padilla I, Camargo-Rivera EE. The role of social media groups on illegal wildlife trade in four Mexican states: A year-long assessment. Global Ecology and Conservation. 2023;45:e02539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02539
37. Mardero S, Schmook B, Calmé S, White RM, Chang JCJ, Casanova G, et al. Traditional knowledge for climate change adaptation in Mesoamerica: A systematic review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. 2023;7(1):100473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100473
38. Salgado M, Gallo LA, Torres CD, Stecconi M, Puntieri JG. Variations in growth and architecture in the range limit of Salix humboldtiana, the willow native to South America. Botany. 2021;99(11):713-23. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2021-0017
39. Sánchez-Castillo V, Gómez-Cano CA, Pérez-Gamboa AJ. La Economía Azul en el contexto de los objetivos del desarrollo sostenible: una revisión mixta e integrada de la literatura en la base de datos Scopus. AiBi Revista de Investigación, Administración e Ingeniería. 2024;12(2):206-21. https://doi.org/10.15649/2346030X.4028
40. Sánchez V, Pérez AJ, Gómez CA. Trends and evolution of Scientometric and Bibliometric research in the SCOPUS database. Bibliotecas. Anales de Investigación. 2024;20(1):1-22. http://revistas.bnjm.sld.cu/index.php/BAI/article/view/834
41. Dingkuhn EL, Wezel A, Bianchi FJJA, Groot JCJ, Wagner A, Yap HT, et al. A multi-method approach for the integrative assessment of soil functions: Application on a coastal mountainous site of the Philippines. Journal of Environmental Management. 2020;264:110461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110461
42. Cusworth G, Garnett T, Lorimer J. Agroecological break out: Legumes, crop diversification and the regenerative futures of UK agriculture. Journal of Rural Studies. 2021;88:126-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.10.005
43. Pigford AAE, Hickey GM, Klerkx L. Beyond agricultural innovation systems? Exploring an agricultural innovation ecosystems approach for niche design and development in sustainability transitions. Agricultural Systems. 2018;164:116-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.04.007
44. Sausse C, Baux A, Bertrand M, Bonnaud E, Canavelli S, Destrez A, et al. Contemporary challenges and opportunities for the management of bird damage at field crop establishment. Crop Protection. 2021;148:105736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105736
45. Blesh J, Hoey L, Jones AD, Friedmann H, Perfecto I. Development pathways toward “zero hunger”. World Development. 2019;118:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.02.004
46. Slimi C, Prost M, Cerf M, Prost L. Exchanges among farmers’ collectives in support of sustainable agriculture: From review to reconceptualization. Journal of Rural Studies. 2021;83:268-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.01.019
47. Kerr RB, Madsen S, Stüber M, Liebert J, Enloe S, Borghino N, et al. Can agroecology improve food security and nutrition? A review. Global Food Security. 2021;29:100540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100540
48. Webb NP, Kachergis E, Miller SW, McCord SE, Bestelmeyer BT, Brown JR, et al. Indicators and benchmarks for wind erosion monitoring, assessment and management. Ecological Indicators. 2020;110:105881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105881
49. Eastburn DJ, Roche LM, Doran MP, Blake PR, Bouril CS, Gamble G, et al. Seeding plants for long-term multiple ecosystem service goals. Journal of Environmental Management. 2018;211:191-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.061
50. Rivera-Ferre MG, Gallar D, Calle-Collado Á, Pimentel V. Agroecological education for food sovereignty: Insights from formal and non-formal spheres in Brazil and Spain. Journal of Rural Studies. 2021;88:138-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.10.003
51. Zeng S, Li J, Wanger TC. Agroecology, technology, and stakeholder awareness: Implementing the UN Food Systems Summit call for action. iScience. 2023;26(9):107510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107510
52. López-García D, Cuéllar-Padilla M, Olival A de A, Laranjeira NP, Méndez VE, Parada SP y, et al. Building agroecology with people. Challenges of participatory methods to deepen on the agroecological transition in different contexts. Journal of Rural Studies. 2021;83:257-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.02.003
53. McCord PF, Cox M, Schmitt-Harsh M, Evans T. Crop diversification as a smallholder livelihood strategy within semi-arid agricultural systems near Mount Kenya. Land Use Policy. 2015;42:738-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.10.012
54. Cortés J, Vieli L, Ibarra JT. Family farming systems: An index-based approach to the drivers of agroecological principles in the southern Andes. Ecological Indicators. 2023;154:110640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110640
55. Phocas F, Belloc C, Bidanel J, Delaby L, Dourmad JY, Dumont B, et al. Review: Towards the agroecological management of ruminants, pigs and poultry through the development of sustainable breeding programmes: I-selection goals and criteria. Animal. 2016;10(11):1749-59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731116000926
56. Ratnadass A, Avelino J, Fernandes P, Letourmy P, Babin R, Deberdt P, et al. Synergies and tradeoffs in natural regulation of crop pests and diseases under plant species diversification. Crop Protection. 2021;146:105658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105658
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Verenice Sánchez-Castillo (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.
