AI for All: Bridging Accessibility and Usability Through User-Centered AI Design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2025751Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Accessibility, Usability, User-Centered Design, Inclusive DesignAbstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies are promised to improve digital services and automate tasks. However, there are still significant barriers to ensuring that AI technologies are accessible and usable by a broad range of users. As AI solutions proliferate across mainstream systems and applications, design-based approaches that explicitly bring in inclusive and human-centric values have become critical. This paper provides a concerted look at user-centered design at the intersection of AI, accessibility, and usability, proposing a framework that cuts across technological, social, and regulatory challenges. Contributions include identifying existing work and current literature gaps, key research questions, and a methodology to explore how to optimize AI systems for the widest possible range of users. We anchor our recommendations with a use-inspired case of an AI-driven public transportation assistant for individuals with diverse physical and cognitive abilities to demonstrate how our framework could benefit real-world applications. On the basis of existing standards and theoretical insights, this paper argues that the design process should be proactive, iterative, and implemented with the participation of multiple stakeholders. In their design of AI systems, this is meant to make the systems adaptive to users, rather than users being adaptive to the AI systems, thus revealing that “AI for all” can indeed be a realistic and realizable paradigm.
References
1. Barocas S, Hardt M, Narayanan A. Fairness and Machine Learning Limitations and Opportunities. In 2018. Available from: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:113402716
2. WHO global disability action plan 2014-2021 [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jan 2]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/who-global-disability-action-plan-2014-2021
3. Donald N. The design of everyday things (Rev ed.). 2013;
4. Norman DA. The psychology of everyday things. 1988;
5. Hollan J, Hutchins E, Kirsh D. Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI). 2000;7(2):174–96.
6. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly. 1989;319–40.
7. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly. 2003;425–78.
8. Nielsen J. 10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design [Internet]. 1994 [cited 2024 Jan 22]. Available from: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/
9. Story MF, Mueller JL, Mace RL. The Universal Design File: Designing for People of All Ages and Abilities. Revised Edition. In 1998. Available from: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:107803016
10. Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive science. 1988;12(2):257–85.
11. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jan 2]. Available from: https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/
12. WAI-ARIA Overview | Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) | W3C [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jan 2]. Available from: https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/aria/
13. ISO [Internet]. [cited 2025 Jan 2]. ISO 9241-210:2019. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/77520.html
14. Nielsen J. Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann; 1994.
15. Amershi S, Weld D, Vorvoreanu M, Fourney A, Nushi B, Collisson P, et al. Guidelines for human-AI interaction. In 2019. p. 1–13.
16. Gunning D, Aha D. DARPA’s explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) program. AI magazine. 2019;40(2):44–58.
17. Mittelstadt B, Russell C, Wachter S. Explaining explanations in AI. In 2019. p. 279–88.
18. Muraina IO, Agoi MA, Adesanya OM, Amao AO. Multi-Modal Signal Processing and Application in Communication. International Journal of Cultural Heritage. 2024;9.
19. Baig MZ, Kavakli M. Multimodal systems: taxonomy, methods, and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:200603813. 2020;
20. Shimomura Y. Multimodal User Interface Design. 2005;
21. Miraz MH, Ali M, Excell PS. Adaptive user interfaces and universal usability through plasticity of user interface design. Computer Science Review. 2021;40:100363.
22. Omar K, Gómez JM. An adaptive system architecture for devising adaptive user interfaces for mobile ERP apps. In IEEE; 2017. p. 1–6.
23. Talukder N. Clinical decision support system: an explainable AI approach. 2024;
24. Bagheri M, Bagheritaba M, Alizadeh S, Parizi MS, Matoufinia P, Luo Y. AI-Driven Decision-Making in Healthcare Information Systems: A Comprehensive Review. 2024;
25. Wiemer H, Schneider D, Lang V, Conrad F, Mälzer M, Boos E, et al. Need for UAI–anatomy of the paradigm of usable artificial intelligence for domain-specific AI applicability. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction. 2023;7(3):27.
26. Shah H. ENHANCING WEB ACCESSIBILITY-NAVIGATING THE UPGRADE OF DESIGN SYSTEMS FROM WCAG 2.0 TO WCAG 2.1.
27. Acosta-Vargas P, Salvador-Acosta B, Novillo-Villegas S, Sarantis D, Salvador-Ullauri L. Generative Artificial Intelligence and Web Accessibility: Towards an Inclusive and Sustainable Future. Emerging Science Journal. 2024;8(4):1602–21.
28. Honarvar A. Automatic generation of User Interface (UI) with the help of AI technologies. 2024;
29. Morrison C, Grayson M, Marques RF, Massiceti D, Longden C, Wen L, et al. Understanding Personalized Accessibility through Teachable AI: Designing and Evaluating Find My Things for People who are Blind or Low Vision. In 2023. p. 1–12.
30. Nama P. AI-Powered Mobile Applications: Revolutionizing User Interaction Through Intelligent Features and Context-Aware Services. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research. 2023;10(01):g611–20.
31. Izadi S, Forouzanfar M. Error Correction and Adaptation in Conversational AI: A Review of Techniques and Applications in Chatbots. AI. 2024;5(2):803–41.
32. Mansourian A, Oucheikh R. ChatGeoAI: Enabling Geospatial Analysis for Public through Natural Language, with Large Language Models. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2024;13(10):348.
33. Maria D. AI-Driven Regulatory Compliance Virtual Assistant for Pharmacovigilance. 2024;
34. Ibiyeye TO, Iornenge JT, Adegbite A. Evaluating Regulatory Compliance In The Finance And Investment Sector: An Analysis Of Current Practices, Challenges, And The Impact Of Emerging Technologies. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance (IOSR-JEF). 2024;15(6):1–8.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Khalil Omar, Izzeddin Matar, Jamal Zraqou, Hussam Fakhouri, Jorge Marx Gómez (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Unless otherwise stated, associated published material is distributed under the same licence.