Integrating surrogate modeling and dynamic crayfish optimization for enhanced performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells

Authors

  • Songjie Wu Foundation Department, Liaoning Institute of Science and Technology,Benxi, 117004,Liaoning, China Author
  • Yang Yang Foundation Department, Liaoning Institute of Science and Technology,Benxi, 117004,Liaoning, China Author
  • Jipeng Mo School of Electrical and Automation Engineering,Liaoning Institute of Science and Technology, Benxi, 117004,Liaoning, China Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56294/dm2026828

Keywords:

Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFCs), Evolutionary Algorithms, Electrical Systems, Capacity, Dynamic Crayfish Optimization (DCO)

Abstract

As a renewable energy solution, proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) deliver high operational effectiveness and reduced environmental discharges, supporting deployment in transportation and fixed power infrastructures. Effective industrial deployment requires optimizing performance by carefully selecting structural parameters and operational conditions. This study proposes a Dynamic Crayfish Optimization (DCO) technique to evaluate and enhance PEMFC performance. Unlike conventional evolutionary algorithms, which are complex and require extensive parameter tuning, the DCO algorithm is simpler, converges faster, and improves optimization efficiency. Key performance-influencing parameters are identified using variance-based feature selection, reducing dimensional complexity, while surrogate learning models accelerate fitness evaluation. The DCO-based optimization simultaneously enhances critical PEMFC metrics: voltage efficiency improves from 60% to 70%, fuel utilization from 85% to 90%, system efficiency from 40 % to 50 %, [w1.1][w1.2]with notable increases in power density and oxygen consistency. The DCO model achieved ξ₂ = 2.2158×10⁻³, ξ₃ = 3.4205×10⁻⁵, ξ₄ = −1.5679×10⁻⁴, Rc= 0.95×10⁻⁴, λ = 25, b = 0.0321. These improvements establish that the DCO outperforms existing techniques across all evaluated criteria. Overall, the proposed method provides a systematic, effective, and robust framework for PEMFC performance optimization, offering significant potential for engineering applications in renewable energy systems. The results highlight the practical value of integrating advanced optimization algorithms with data-driven surrogate models in fuel cell research.

References

1. Yang Z, Liu Q, Zhang L, Dai J, Razmjooy N. Model parameter estimation of the PEMFCs using improved barnacles mating optimization algorithm. Energy. 2020;212:118738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118738

2. He K, Zhang C, He Q, Wu Q, Jackson L, Mao L. Effectiveness of PEMFC historical state and operating mode in PEMFC prognosis. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2020;45(56):32355–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.149

3. Zhang X, Ni M, Wang J, Yang L, Mao X, Su S, et al. Configuration design and parametric optimum selection of a self-supporting PEMFC. Energy Convers Manag. 2020;225:113391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113391

4. Qiu D, Zhou X, Chen M, Xu Z, Peng L. Optimization of control strategy for air-cooled PEMFC based on in-situ observation of internal reaction state. Appl Energy. 2023;350:121752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121752

5. Riad AJ, Hasanien HM, Turky RA, Yakout AH. Identifying the PEM fuel cell parameters using artificial rabbits optimization algorithm. Sustainability. 2023;15(5):4625. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054625

6. Zhang D, Yang Y, Fang J, Alkhayyat A. An optimal methodology for optimal controlling of a PEMFC connected to the grid based on amended penguin optimization algorithm. Sustain Energy Technol Assess. 2022;53:102401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102401

7. Yang Y, Zhang H, Yan P, Jermsittiparsert K. Multi-objective optimization for efficient modeling and improvement of the high temperature PEM fuel cell based Micro-CHP system. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2020;45(11):6970–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.189

8. Zhou H, Wu X, Li Y, Fan Z, Chen W, Mao J, et al. Model optimization of a high-power commercial PEMFC system via an improved grey wolf optimization method. Fuel. 2024;357:129589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129589

9. Hu D, Wang Y, Li J, Yang Q, Wang J. Investigation of optimal operating temperature for the PEMFC and its tracking control for energy saving in vehicle applications. Energy Convers Manag. 2021;249:114842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114842

10. Wang T, Zhou H, Zhu C. A short-term and long-term prognostic method for PEM fuel cells based on Gaussian process regression. Energies. 2022;15(13):4844. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15134844

11. Liu Z, Chen J, Liu H, Yan C, Hou Y, He Q, et al. Anode purge management for hydrogen utilization and stack durability improvement of PEM fuel cell systems. Appl Energy. 2020;275:115110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115110

12. Tang X, Zhang Y, Xu S. Temperature sensitivity characteristics of PEM fuel cell and output performance improvement based on optimal active temperature control. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2023;206:123966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2023.123966

13. Mao X, Liu S, Tan J, Hu H, Lu C, Xuan D. Multi-objective optimization of gradient porosity of gas diffusion layer and operation parameters in PEMFC based on recombination optimization compromise strategy. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2023;48(35):13294–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.226

14. Ghasabehi M, Jabbary A, Shams M. Cathode side transport phenomena investigation and Multi-Objective optimization of a tapered parallel flow field PEMFC. Energy Convers Manag. 2022;265:115761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115761

15. Soubeyran G, Micoud F, Morin B, Reytier M, Poirot-Crouvezier J. Improved operating strategies for the optimization of PEMFC system performance. J Power Sources. 2024;597:234089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.234089

16. Yang Y, Bai M, Zhou Z, Wu WT, Zhao J, Wei L, et al. A 3D PtCo degradation model for long-term performance prediction of a scaled-up PEMFC under constant voltage operation. Energy Convers Manag. 2024;300:117918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117918

17. Gu H, Peng C, Qian Z, Lv S, Feng J, Luo K, et al. Design and optimization of gas channel with groove baffles for PEMFC using genetic algorithm. Int J Heat Mass Transf. 2024;227:125543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2024.125543

18. Aljaidi M, Jangir P, Arpita, Agrawal SP, Pandya SB, Parmar A, et al. A novel Parrot Optimizer for robust and scalable PEMFC parameter optimization. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):11625. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-94730-7

19. Diab AAZ, Ali H, Abdul-Ghaffar HI, Abdelsalam HA, Abd El Sattar M. Accurate parameters extraction of PEMFC model based on metaheuristics algorithms. Energy Rep. 2021;7:6854–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.09.145

Downloads

Published

2026-02-11

Issue

Section

Original

How to Cite

1.
Wu S, Yang Y, Mo J. Integrating surrogate modeling and dynamic crayfish optimization for enhanced performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Data and Metadata [Internet]. 2026 Feb. 11 [cited 2026 Feb. 25];5:828. Available from: https://dm.ageditor.ar/index.php/dm/article/view/828